STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA

Grasberg Block Caving (GBC) mine is undergorund mine located in Gunung Bijih District Mine, Mimika, Papua. The research was conducted in west access 3 to north from west fringe drift tunnel in undercut level located at elevation about 2,845m. The objectives of this research were to obtain mass rock...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Chandra Bhakti, Novika
Format: Final Project
Language:Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/46769
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:46769
spelling id-itb.:467692020-03-11T15:40:35ZSTABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA Chandra Bhakti, Novika Geologi, hidrologi & meteorologi Indonesia Final Project tunnel stability, RMR, Q-System, finite element method, GBC INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/46769 Grasberg Block Caving (GBC) mine is undergorund mine located in Gunung Bijih District Mine, Mimika, Papua. The research was conducted in west access 3 to north from west fringe drift tunnel in undercut level located at elevation about 2,845m. The objectives of this research were to obtain mass rock rating based on RMR and Q-System, to get ground support recommendation based on RMR value and Q value, and to analyze the stability of supported tunnel obtained from RMR method and Q-system. The research area consisted of Intermediate Intrusive Dalam Phase Rock emplaced approximately at Pliocene and strongly altered composed of sericite, secondary quartz, pyrite and covellite. RMR value of the rock mass were ranging from 53 to 65 classed from Fair to Good class, while Q value were ranging from 0.1 to 0.35 classed as very poor class. RMR method recommended to support the tunnel with rockbolt, shotcrete and wiremesh, while Q method recommended to support it with rockbolt and fibrecrete. Strength factors of Q-recommendation supported tunnels were always above 1.2 while RMR-recommendation supported tunnesl were not always have SF above 1.2. Displacement total of RMR-recommendation supported tunnels was ranging 6.6 – 8.5 mm at roof dan 5.7 – 7.7 mm at wall, while Q-recommendation tunnels were ranging 6.3 – 8 mm at roof dan 5.8 – 7.7 mm at wall. Finite element model analysis showed Q-recommendation support was suitable for west access 3 to north from west fringe drift tunnel. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
topic Geologi, hidrologi & meteorologi
spellingShingle Geologi, hidrologi & meteorologi
Chandra Bhakti, Novika
STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA
description Grasberg Block Caving (GBC) mine is undergorund mine located in Gunung Bijih District Mine, Mimika, Papua. The research was conducted in west access 3 to north from west fringe drift tunnel in undercut level located at elevation about 2,845m. The objectives of this research were to obtain mass rock rating based on RMR and Q-System, to get ground support recommendation based on RMR value and Q value, and to analyze the stability of supported tunnel obtained from RMR method and Q-system. The research area consisted of Intermediate Intrusive Dalam Phase Rock emplaced approximately at Pliocene and strongly altered composed of sericite, secondary quartz, pyrite and covellite. RMR value of the rock mass were ranging from 53 to 65 classed from Fair to Good class, while Q value were ranging from 0.1 to 0.35 classed as very poor class. RMR method recommended to support the tunnel with rockbolt, shotcrete and wiremesh, while Q method recommended to support it with rockbolt and fibrecrete. Strength factors of Q-recommendation supported tunnels were always above 1.2 while RMR-recommendation supported tunnesl were not always have SF above 1.2. Displacement total of RMR-recommendation supported tunnels was ranging 6.6 – 8.5 mm at roof dan 5.7 – 7.7 mm at wall, while Q-recommendation tunnels were ranging 6.3 – 8 mm at roof dan 5.8 – 7.7 mm at wall. Finite element model analysis showed Q-recommendation support was suitable for west access 3 to north from west fringe drift tunnel.
format Final Project
author Chandra Bhakti, Novika
author_facet Chandra Bhakti, Novika
author_sort Chandra Bhakti, Novika
title STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA
title_short STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA
title_full STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA
title_fullStr STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA
title_full_unstemmed STABILITY ANALYSIS OF MINE TUNNEL USING RMR, Q-SYSTEM, AND FINITE ELEMENT METHOD IN UNDERCUT LEVEL, GBC MINE, MIMIKA, PAPUA
title_sort stability analysis of mine tunnel using rmr, q-system, and finite element method in undercut level, gbc mine, mimika, papua
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/46769
_version_ 1822927471873359872