DEVELOPING DISASTER RECOVERY PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (CASE STUDY OF PT. IMPCC)
As the construction industry strives through years of countless competitions, developments, innovations, and improvements. It came to this age where most construction companies use Information and Technology (IT) systems to support their business, including their business processes. Indonesian Mu...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/53060 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | As the construction industry strives through years of countless competitions, developments,
innovations, and improvements. It came to this age where most construction companies use
Information and Technology (IT) systems to support their business, including their business
processes. Indonesian Multinational Private Construction Company (IMPCC, not the real
name), as a major player in the Indonesian construction industry, also uses IT systems to
underline IMPCC’s business processes, centralized in 2 Data Centers (DCs). The DCs went
into a disastrous event, which cost them a lot in the third quarter of 2019. The event urged them
to study the Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) to avoid the same disaster or similar risks from
hitting IMPCC’s IT systems.
Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) is planning, developing, implementing, and improving the
availability of a company’s IT systems for an organization to ensure its continuity by planning,
developing, and implementing processes and procedures to survive through uncertainties. The
DRP processes are Business Impact Analysis (BIA) for identifying divisions, business
processes, IT systems used by them, priorities, and tolerance of IT Systems’ data loss and time
of disruption. Then Risk Analysis (RA), developing the DRP strategies, strategies for testing
and training, and the implementation plan.
From the analysis process done in this study, from 36 threats identified, three threats address
the significant risk of DC A and DC B being in one area of locations, which lead to a conclusion
of moving either one or both of the DCs to a different area of locations.
|
|---|