PERANCANGAN STRATEGI KORPORASI PT X DENGAN ANALISIS SWOT DAN MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION
X company is a Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) which distributes Japanese industrial equipment to the automotive industry in Indonesia. The company’s revenue fell sharply on 2019 as a result of the decrease in the industry’s growth. This condition urges the owner of Z company to rethink...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/53972 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | X company is a Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SME) which distributes
Japanese industrial equipment to the automotive industry in Indonesia. The
company’s revenue fell sharply on 2019 as a result of the decrease in the industry’s
growth. This condition urges the owner of Z company to rethink their future
especially on where should the company head towards.
This study aims to provide alternative strategies which are based on the internal
and external analysis of the company. Internal analysis is done by adopting the
Resource-Based View to identify resources which may become the company’s
competitive advantage. On the other hand external analysis is done by analyzing
Porter’s Five Forces, the future of automotive industry in the country, as well as
product portfolio using General Electric (GE) Matrix. The result of both analysis
is used to create the Strength, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT)
matrix. This matrix in turn helps to generate the mentioned alternative strategies.
A method of Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is utilized to determine
the best strategy in which the company is able to work on. MCDA is used for it is
implausible to make decisions, especially in this uncertain situations, with only a
single criteria. The particular MCDA method used is determined by assessing
variables which define the characteristics of each and every method. On this
particular study, the method deemed most suitable is Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy
Process (FAHP). The company’s stakeholder acts as the decision maker, using
questionnaires to locate their preferences.
The alternative strategies which are considered by the company to be the most
important, are market penetration, market development and product portfolio
development to existing market. By using FAHP as a decision making tool, the
company decided that product portolio development is the best strategy to be
implemented.
|
---|