INDONESIAN SLUM UPGRADING PROGRAM: FROM COLLABORATIVE TO CO PRODUCTION
Indonesia's slum upgrading experience for more than six decades shows that the universalization of planning theory has produced unsatisfactory results. The technical approach with dominant government-oriented intervention in slum upgrading used in the 70s proved ineffective and was soon repl...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/57799 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Indonesia's slum upgrading experience for more than six decades shows that the
universalization of planning theory has produced unsatisfactory results. The
technical approach with dominant government-oriented intervention in slum
upgrading used in the 70s proved ineffective and was soon replaced with an
advocacy approach. Later evaluations showed that limited community involvement
appeared to be a weakness of advocacy, resulting in low community motivation in
maintaining infrastructure. Learning from this experience, the attention of
policymakers began to shift to a community-based development approach.
Unfortunately, the community-based development approach has not yielded
maximum results. One of the reasons was that the community organizations need
strong support from the government to become self-reliant. Learning from this
experience, collaborative planning theory that has been a guide in the planning
world since the 1980s is defined more broadly according to local contexts and
issues. Through KOTAKU – the latest national slum upgrading program- this thesis
aims to see how the nuances of co-production emerge in a collaborative planning
environment that is firmly entrenched in Indonesia. This thesis was conducted by
utilizing the literature, policy documents and interviews with key stakeholders.
Study results indicate that aspects of public organization, attitudes, culture, and
incentives influence the government in shaping co-production, while society is
influenced by characteristics, awareness, and social capital. By understanding how
co-production appears in n slum upgrading, it is hoped to open an opportunity to
scale up the co-production approach and apply it in other development programs
and public service delivery policies. |
---|