PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
PT Hardtmann Mekatroniske Indonesia (HMI) is a private company specializing in applied technology consultants concentrating on smart devices product development and cyber-physical system integrators. Stakeholders of HMI wants to know and decide which project opportunities should be prioritized ba...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/62749 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | PT Hardtmann Mekatroniske Indonesia (HMI) is a private company specializing in
applied technology consultants concentrating on smart devices product
development and cyber-physical system integrators. Stakeholders of HMI wants to
know and decide which project opportunities should be prioritized based on current
condition and limiting factors currently HMI has. The project categories are
classified as Full Stack Project (FS), Hardware Projects (HW), Software Projects
(SW), and Manufacturing Projects (MF). Each project category has unique
characteristics that draw different preferences between stakeholders. This research
aimed to perform the project category prioritization with multi-criteria and multiparticipant
decision
making.
The
project categories will be processed through Analytic Hierarchy Process
(AHP) to determine which one to be prioritized. AHP process includes defining
goals, defining criteria, defining sub-criteria, creating decision hierarchy,
performing the pairwise comparison, and deriving priorities for each alternative
(project categories). In this research, criteria were obtained from FGD with
directors, which result in 5 criteria, namely: Financial, Customer Profile,
Resource, Learning Opportunity, and Strategic Alignment. Some of the criteria are
broken down into sub-criteria to gain more comparative importance. The
importance rank for each criterion will be derived from each alternative, which is
FS, HW, SW, and MF.
|
---|