PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

PT Hardtmann Mekatroniske Indonesia (HMI) is a private company specializing in applied technology consultants concentrating on smart devices product development and cyber-physical system integrators. Stakeholders of HMI wants to know and decide which project opportunities should be prioritized ba...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Faris Fachrurrobbi Silmy, Ahmad
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/62749
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
id id-itb.:62749
spelling id-itb.:627492022-01-18T15:07:39ZPROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) Faris Fachrurrobbi Silmy, Ahmad Manajemen umum Indonesia Theses Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), cyber-physical integration, project prioritization. INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/62749 PT Hardtmann Mekatroniske Indonesia (HMI) is a private company specializing in applied technology consultants concentrating on smart devices product development and cyber-physical system integrators. Stakeholders of HMI wants to know and decide which project opportunities should be prioritized based on current condition and limiting factors currently HMI has. The project categories are classified as Full Stack Project (FS), Hardware Projects (HW), Software Projects (SW), and Manufacturing Projects (MF). Each project category has unique characteristics that draw different preferences between stakeholders. This research aimed to perform the project category prioritization with multi-criteria and multiparticipant decision making. The project categories will be processed through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine which one to be prioritized. AHP process includes defining goals, defining criteria, defining sub-criteria, creating decision hierarchy, performing the pairwise comparison, and deriving priorities for each alternative (project categories). In this research, criteria were obtained from FGD with directors, which result in 5 criteria, namely: Financial, Customer Profile, Resource, Learning Opportunity, and Strategic Alignment. Some of the criteria are broken down into sub-criteria to gain more comparative importance. The importance rank for each criterion will be derived from each alternative, which is FS, HW, SW, and MF. text
institution Institut Teknologi Bandung
building Institut Teknologi Bandung Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Institut Teknologi Bandung
collection Digital ITB
language Indonesia
topic Manajemen umum
spellingShingle Manajemen umum
Faris Fachrurrobbi Silmy, Ahmad
PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
description PT Hardtmann Mekatroniske Indonesia (HMI) is a private company specializing in applied technology consultants concentrating on smart devices product development and cyber-physical system integrators. Stakeholders of HMI wants to know and decide which project opportunities should be prioritized based on current condition and limiting factors currently HMI has. The project categories are classified as Full Stack Project (FS), Hardware Projects (HW), Software Projects (SW), and Manufacturing Projects (MF). Each project category has unique characteristics that draw different preferences between stakeholders. This research aimed to perform the project category prioritization with multi-criteria and multiparticipant decision making. The project categories will be processed through Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine which one to be prioritized. AHP process includes defining goals, defining criteria, defining sub-criteria, creating decision hierarchy, performing the pairwise comparison, and deriving priorities for each alternative (project categories). In this research, criteria were obtained from FGD with directors, which result in 5 criteria, namely: Financial, Customer Profile, Resource, Learning Opportunity, and Strategic Alignment. Some of the criteria are broken down into sub-criteria to gain more comparative importance. The importance rank for each criterion will be derived from each alternative, which is FS, HW, SW, and MF.
format Theses
author Faris Fachrurrobbi Silmy, Ahmad
author_facet Faris Fachrurrobbi Silmy, Ahmad
author_sort Faris Fachrurrobbi Silmy, Ahmad
title PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
title_short PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
title_full PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
title_fullStr PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
title_full_unstemmed PROJECT CATEGORY PRIORITIZATION ANALYSIS IN PT HMI USING ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
title_sort project category prioritization analysis in pt hmi using analytic hierarchy process (ahp)
url https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/62749
_version_ 1822276618400301056