AUTOMATIC INDIVIDUAL TREE SEGMENTATION AND 3D MODELING FOR GREEN OPEN SPACE MANAGEMENT USING LIDAR POINT CLOUD DATA AND PHOTOGRAMMETRY
Global environmental change is an ongoing issue and has been widely discussed from various perspectives. The three main factors contributing to global environmental change are increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, changes in the global adhesion cycle, and land cover/land use cha...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/64049 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Global environmental change is an ongoing issue and has been widely discussed from various
perspectives. The three main factors contributing to global environmental change are
increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations, changes in the global adhesion cycle,
and land cover/land use changes. The increase in the concentration of carbon dioxide mainly
occurs in urban areas because urban areas account for more than 70% of carbon dioxide
emissions. The development and management of green open spaces are essential in overcoming
environmental problems such as air pollution and urban warming. 3D modeling is one of the
efforts in managing green open spaces. In this study, 3D modeling was carried out on point
data obtained by UAV photogrammetry and UAV LiDAR methods. 3D modeling is done
explicitly using the best fitting method on point cloud data. This study uses three fitting
methods, namely the spherical best fitting method, the best fitting ellipsoid method, and the
spherical harmonics best fitting method. The best-fitting spherical harmonics method produces
the best results and an average R2 value of 0.711. In this study, Above-Ground Biomass
calculations were also carried out from the modeling results using three methods with LiDAR
and Photogrammetry data. AGB calculation using LiDAR data gives better results than using
photogrammetric data. The AGB calculation using LiDAR data gives an error of 2-7% from
the field validation results. AGB calculation using the spherical harmonics method gives
results closest to the AGB value of field validation. However, a 3D model from
photogrammetric data using the spherical harmonics method can be used for visualization
purposes with a not too large area. |
---|