PLANNING AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT FOR PROJECT COMPLETION ASSURANCE IMPROVEMENT (CASE STUDY: LAND HANDOVER PROJECT IN PT CPAC INDONESIA)

PT CPAC is highly committed in protecting people and environment and protection of its assets and the environment where the company operates by managing environmental impact caused by its exploration and production activities including Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil (HIS). After meeting environmental sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Surya, Angga
Format: Theses
Language:Indonesia
Subjects:
Online Access:https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/65057
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung
Language: Indonesia
Description
Summary:PT CPAC is highly committed in protecting people and environment and protection of its assets and the environment where the company operates by managing environmental impact caused by its exploration and production activities including Hydrocarbon Impacted Soil (HIS). After meeting environmental standard for soil remediation project completion, area that belongs to local community and outside party should be returned/handover to enable productive area reutilization. During period Jan 2020 – Oct 2020, only 49 remediated sites and 1 GWM well site that could be managed to complete land handover process. Based on verification & validation process in end of October 2020, 169 sites which consist of approximately 609 land owner parcels were identified to be returned through land handover process. Approaching expiration of Production Sharing Contract in 8 Aug 2021, PT CPAC management urged to complete all land handover field work activity by end of May 2021 to enable invoicing and document close out process. Business problem exploration, planning activity and strategy formulation was conducted using project management approach with PMBOK as guideline due to its suitability, level of details, flexibility and complete coverage. Several root causes were found and grouped into 5 categories which are flow process/scope, schedule, resources, risk and communication. For root causes in flow process/scope category, several land handover flow processes are proposed to be leaned and improved. For schedule, accelerated schedule is proposed to be developed and fast-tracking technique by starting preliminary works land handover for non GWM well land parcel while waiting for clean declaration, need to be implemented. To fulfill resource allocation needs based on Primavera simulation on project role which have most job load / activity, crash program needs to be conducted. More intensive communication package also required to ensure alignment, coordination and progress monitoring. As an exit plan, potentially delay / risky sites with proper documentation need to be included into handover documents list to new operator and communicated to SKK Migas minimum in monthly basis. Beside technical factor, social economic approach to local community through local community development program and socialization is needed to to breach the barrier and ease the execution of land handover project. After all proposed solutions are implemented, progress of land handover project was straightly accelerated from 50 sites during period Jan – Oct 2020 or around 5 sites per month (prior to implementation) into 121 sites during period Nov 2020 – Mar 2021 or around 24 sites per month. However, clean declaration letter was not delivered as expected and even until end of May 2021. As per proposed solutions, Project team has completed preliminary work of land handover process for remaining 45 remediated sites (non GWM well parcel) that has not obtained clean declaration. Remaining activities are land handover process (BAST signing or notification letter delivery) and document archive. Handover document list already accommodate those remaining 45 remediated sites with proper documentation to be continued by new operator after PSC expiration and has been communicated regularly to SKK Migas.