RISK ASSESSMENT ON PROVIDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION BY COMBINING RISK MATRIX AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)
Indonesia is one of the country that signed the Paris Agreement on Climate Change with commitment to restrain the rate increase of global average temperature and putting efforts to limit temperature rise. An adjustment on facing climate change is promoting and shifting on electric vehicle (EV) as...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/65285 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | Indonesia is one of the country that signed the Paris Agreement on Climate Change
with commitment to restrain the rate increase of global average temperature and
putting efforts to limit temperature rise. An adjustment on facing climate change is
promoting and shifting on electric vehicle (EV) as a sustainable transportation. The
fear of running out of power on a journey (range anxiety) is one of major concern
in purchasing EV. Therefor, the availability of charging infrastructure could
accommodate customers’ needs.
Based on Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 55 of 2019
related to the acceleration of the implementation of Electric Motorized Vehicles
and Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 13 of
2020 concerning Provision of Electric Charging Infrastructure for Battery-Based
Electric Motorized Vehicles, PLN was assigned to provide electric vehicle
infrastructure or EV Charging Station (Stasiun Pengisian Kendaraan Listrik
Umum/SPKLU). To ensure the fulfillment of EV stations services, a comprehensive
planning is required accompanied by risk management, therefor all scenarios could
have been prepared for potential risks in the future.
The objective of this study is to define risk prioritization on Risk Assessment by
using Risk Matrix and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The data collection
method is using individual interview and risk survey with 4 respondents from
different relevant business process owner. Risks are clustered in 5 risk categories,
there are Strategic risk, Finance risk, Operational risk, Project risk, and
Compliance risk. The result of risk assessment is to define mitigation to maximize
available resources in achieving the targeted number of SPKLU. In total of 13
identified risks, there are 5 Very High risk, 7 High risk, and 1 Moderate risk.
Reffered to PLN’s Risk Appetite at Moderate Level and Low level, there are 12 risks
that will be mitigated. Action plan is scheduled to be implemented and monitored. |
|---|