RISK ASSESSMENT ON PROVIDING ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING STATION BY COMBINING RISK MATRIX AND ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

• Main Author: Laura Lidya, Gabriella
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Subjects: Manajemen umum
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/65285
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

Indonesia is one of the country that signed the Paris Agreement on Climate Change with commitment to restrain the rate increase of global average temperature and putting efforts to limit temperature rise. An adjustment on facing climate change is promoting and shifting on electric vehicle (EV) as a sustainable transportation. The fear of running out of power on a journey (range anxiety) is one of major concern in purchasing EV. Therefor, the availability of charging infrastructure could accommodate customers’ needs. Based on Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 55 of 2019 related to the acceleration of the implementation of Electric Motorized Vehicles and Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 13 of 2020 concerning Provision of Electric Charging Infrastructure for Battery-Based Electric Motorized Vehicles, PLN was assigned to provide electric vehicle infrastructure or EV Charging Station (Stasiun Pengisian Kendaraan Listrik Umum/SPKLU). To ensure the fulfillment of EV stations services, a comprehensive planning is required accompanied by risk management, therefor all scenarios could have been prepared for potential risks in the future. The objective of this study is to define risk prioritization on Risk Assessment by using Risk Matrix and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The data collection method is using individual interview and risk survey with 4 respondents from different relevant business process owner. Risks are clustered in 5 risk categories, there are Strategic risk, Finance risk, Operational risk, Project risk, and Compliance risk. The result of risk assessment is to define mitigation to maximize available resources in achieving the targeted number of SPKLU. In total of 13 identified risks, there are 5 Very High risk, 7 High risk, and 1 Moderate risk. Reffered to PLN’s Risk Appetite at Moderate Level and Low level, there are 12 risks that will be mitigated. Action plan is scheduled to be implemented and monitored.