INTERACTION DESIGN REFINEMENT OF SIX ITB USING USERCENTERED DESIGN APPROACH
Information regarding academic administration is a vital toward the running process of an institution. Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) is utilizing a website to make sure that information can be easily transferred between the lecturers, students, and administrators. This website is called S...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Final Project |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66332 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Information regarding academic administration is a vital toward the running process of an
institution. Bandung Institute of Technology (ITB) is utilizing a website to make sure that
information can be easily transferred between the lecturers, students, and administrators. This
website is called SIX ITB. However, according to the users, there are still a few problems regarding
SIX ITB’s appearance, user’s comfort, and user flow. Based on these problems, this last
assignment was conducted to refine the interaction design of SIX ITB. The approach that is used
in this last assignment is the user centered design with the purpose of seeing the problems through
the perspective of the users. The usability goals of this design are effective, efficient, and easy to
use while the user experience goals are useful and findable. The creation of this design interaction
is also based on user experience laws such as Moore’s law, Jakob’s law, and Fitt’s law. The result
of this last assignment is a high-fidelity prototype that was tested by usability testing. This usability
testing is measured by System Usability Scale (SUS) that gained 90.5 out of 100 in the two
iteration, Single Ease Question (SEQ) with the score 6.73 out of 7 in the first iteration and 6.83
out of 7 in the second iteration, and Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) with 2.52 out of 7 in the
first iteration and 2.28 out of 7 in the second iteration for the subscale effort/importance, 6.78 out
of 7 in the first iteration and 6.8 out of 7 in the second iteration for the subscale value/usefulness,
and 6.5 out of 7 in the first iteration and 6.63 out of 7 in the second iteration for the subscale
perceived competence. This shows that the prototype can be accepted as the solution. |
---|