ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC
PT ABC had been appointed to be the BUMN that will execute the renewable energy investment project as determined by the ESDM Ministry through Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) 2021-2030. PT ABC is expected to execute renewable energy projects that could increase the renewable energy...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66661 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
id |
id-itb.:66661 |
---|---|
spelling |
id-itb.:666612022-07-01T08:17:41ZANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC Pambangun, Esthi Manajemen umum Indonesia Theses Analytical hierarchy process, AHP, Sustainable energy investment, Power plants, Hydropower plants, Water resource management, Solar resource management, Solar power plant INSTITUT TEKNOLOGI BANDUNG https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66661 PT ABC had been appointed to be the BUMN that will execute the renewable energy investment project as determined by the ESDM Ministry through Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik (RUPTL) 2021-2030. PT ABC is expected to execute renewable energy projects that could increase the renewable energy contribution to increase total energy production capacity from 13% in 2020 to 23% in 2025 and 29% by 2030. The objective of this study is to assist in the alternative selection of the best renewable energy investment for PT ABC. PT ABC investment decision involves the selection of the best project and the appropriate vendor for respective projects. Energy projects that would be compared in this study are Pumped Storage Hydropower Plant, Grounded Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant, and Floating Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant. This study uses the multiple criteria decision making: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the involvement of experts and stakeholders to give rankings that would be representative and data to suggest the best decision for PT ABC and the most important factors to take that decision. Criteria that would be assessed in decision making are financial factors (Output transaction price, returns, capital expenditure, and default risk), production (quantity of production, quality of production, supply and demand continuity, and constructability), impact to other parties (impact to PT ABC business operations and surrounding living ecosystem). Based on the AHP analysis conducted in this study, floating photovoltaic solar power plant is the best project alternative to be prioritized. Floating SPPF vendor offers the best returns and production efficiency is the best vendor alternative based on AHP analysis. This study also found that supply and demand continuity, returns, and default risk are the top three most important factors in renewable energy investment decision making. text |
institution |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
building |
Institut Teknologi Bandung Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Indonesia Indonesia |
content_provider |
Institut Teknologi Bandung |
collection |
Digital ITB |
language |
Indonesia |
topic |
Manajemen umum |
spellingShingle |
Manajemen umum Pambangun, Esthi ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC |
description |
PT ABC had been appointed to be the BUMN that will execute the renewable energy investment
project as determined by the ESDM Ministry through Rencana Usaha Penyediaan Tenaga Listrik
(RUPTL) 2021-2030. PT ABC is expected to execute renewable energy projects that could
increase the renewable energy contribution to increase total energy production capacity from
13% in 2020 to 23% in 2025 and 29% by 2030. The objective of this study is to assist in the
alternative selection of the best renewable energy investment for PT ABC. PT ABC investment
decision involves the selection of the best project and the appropriate vendor for respective
projects. Energy projects that would be compared in this study are Pumped Storage Hydropower
Plant, Grounded Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant, and Floating Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant.
This study uses the multiple criteria decision making: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with
the involvement of experts and stakeholders to give rankings that would be representative and
data to suggest the best decision for PT ABC and the most important factors to take that decision.
Criteria that would be assessed in decision making are financial factors (Output transaction price,
returns, capital expenditure, and default risk), production (quantity of production, quality of
production, supply and demand continuity, and constructability), impact to other parties (impact
to PT ABC business operations and surrounding living ecosystem). Based on the AHP analysis
conducted in this study, floating photovoltaic solar power plant is the best project alternative to
be prioritized. Floating SPPF vendor offers the best returns and production efficiency is the best
vendor alternative based on AHP analysis. This study also found that supply and demand
continuity, returns, and default risk are the top three most important factors in renewable energy
investment decision making. |
format |
Theses |
author |
Pambangun, Esthi |
author_facet |
Pambangun, Esthi |
author_sort |
Pambangun, Esthi |
title |
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC |
title_short |
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC |
title_full |
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC |
title_fullStr |
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC |
title_full_unstemmed |
ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS TO SELECT PARTNER TO DEVELOP RENEWABLE ENERGY CASE STUDY: PT ABC |
title_sort |
analytic hierarchy process to select partner to develop renewable energy case study: pt abc |
url |
https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/66661 |
_version_ |
1822933110935781376 |