ANALYSIS OF PPP, SUKUK, AND SWF AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING SCHEMES IN INDONESIA
This study will analyze infrastructure funding plans to determine which of the available options is the most advantageous. As Infrastructure investment is vital to economic growth. Infrastructure development boosts economic growth. Inefficient economies result from bad infrastructure. Companies...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/67053 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | This study will analyze infrastructure funding plans to determine which of the available options is the most
advantageous. As Infrastructure investment is vital to economic growth. Infrastructure development boosts
economic growth. Inefficient economies result from bad infrastructure. Companies that can't afford them may be
charged hefty fees.
Indonesia's archipelagic size and population make it difficult to disperse development. To speed up development,
the government has set a baseline for purchasing economic infrastructure. The government can't independently
finance infrastructure projects. All of these constraints, plus limited government resources, lead the government
to use private sector financing for infrastructure.
In Indonesia, three funding models involve private engagement in infrastructure construction. These include PPP,
PBS, and the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF). Each plan has advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, it's vital to
examine and research which is best for the government's infrastructure project. Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo
analysis, and value-for-money analysis can compare existing funding strategies.
Keywords: Public-Private Partnership; PPP; Infrastructure Funding; Project Based Sukuk; Indonesia; Sovereign
Wealth Fund; SWF; Monte Carlo; Value For Money. |
|---|