ANALYSIS OF PPP, SUKUK, AND SWF AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING SCHEMES IN INDONESIA

• Main Author: Arlan, Roby
• Format: Theses
• Language: Indonesia
• Online Access: https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/67053
• Institution: Institut Teknologi Bandung

This study will analyze infrastructure funding plans to determine which of the available options is the most advantageous. As Infrastructure investment is vital to economic growth. Infrastructure development boosts economic growth. Inefficient economies result from bad infrastructure. Companies that can't afford them may be charged hefty fees. Indonesia's archipelagic size and population make it difficult to disperse development. To speed up development, the government has set a baseline for purchasing economic infrastructure. The government can't independently finance infrastructure projects. All of these constraints, plus limited government resources, lead the government to use private sector financing for infrastructure. In Indonesia, three funding models involve private engagement in infrastructure construction. These include PPP, PBS, and the Sovereign Wealth Fund (SWF). Each plan has advantages and disadvantages. Therefore, it's vital to examine and research which is best for the government's infrastructure project. Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo analysis, and value-for-money analysis can compare existing funding strategies. Keywords: Public-Private Partnership; PPP; Infrastructure Funding; Project Based Sukuk; Indonesia; Sovereign Wealth Fund; SWF; Monte Carlo; Value For Money.