BARRIER MODEL DEVELOPMENT FOR INDUSTRY 4.0 TECHNOLOGIES ADOPTION IN SMALL-TO-MEDIUM FOOD AND BEVERAGE INDUSTRY IN JAVA ISLAND, INDONESIA
Taiwan, striving for global competitiveness, has promoted Industry 4.0, setting a benchmark for its adoption. The adoption of Industry 4.0 is anticipated to enhance company efficiency, productivity, and product customization. Indonesia has developed a strategic plan called Making Indonesia 4.0, i...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Theses |
Language: | Indonesia |
Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/84645 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
Language: | Indonesia |
Summary: | Taiwan, striving for global competitiveness, has promoted Industry 4.0, setting a
benchmark for its adoption. The adoption of Industry 4.0 is anticipated to enhance
company efficiency, productivity, and product customization. Indonesia has
developed a strategic plan called Making Indonesia 4.0, in which the food and
beverage industry is one of the top priority sectors based on its impact and
feasibility. This industry is predominantly composed of small-to-medium industry
that struggle to adopt Industry 4.0 technologies. Therefore, this study examines the
interrelationships among barriers and identifies the critical obstacles to
implementing Industry 4.0 in small-to-medium industry within Indonesia's food and
beverage sector. To achieve this, an integrated methodology combining the Delphi
Method, Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM), and Matrix Impact with Cross
Multiplication Applied to Classification (MICMAC) analysis is employed. The
barriers to Industry 4.0 implementation are conceptualized using the Technology-
Organization-Environment (TOE) framework. This study finds that the MICMAC
analysis supports the model derived from the ISM results. Insufficient government
support, the need for investment, inadequate Industry 4.0 training, and insufficient
standardization efforts are critical barriers, located in the independent cluster
according to the MICMAC analysis, and are positioned at high levels (level 6, level
5, level 4) in the ISM model.
|
---|