DETERMINING THE BEST ALTERNATIVE TO BUILD & OPERATE COAL CRUSHING FACILITIES; ANALYTIC HIERARCHY APPROACH
PT. KLM is one of the coal producers in Indonesia with a production capacity of up to 55 million tons per year. The operational area includes sites A and B, covering a total area of approximately 65,000 hectares. In region A, coal is delivered by truck from the mine, then crushed, and subsequentl...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://digilib.itb.ac.id/gdl/view/85838 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Institut Teknologi Bandung |
| Language: | Indonesia |
| Summary: | PT. KLM is one of the coal producers in Indonesia with a production capacity of
up to 55 million tons per year. The operational area includes sites A and B, covering
a total area of approximately 65,000 hectares. In region A, coal is delivered by
truck from the mine, then crushed, and subsequently transported to the port where
it is loaded onto ships using a conveyor. Currently, the mining location is getting
farther from the Coal Processing Plant (CPP).
From the Life of Mine developed by the Company, the new Pit location is
approximately 17 km from the existing CPP and about 7 km to the Coal Terminal.
The economic evaluation study considers that the company is planning to build a
crushing facility to reduce the operational costs of coal hauling near the pit. The
case study for the financing plan of the new coal crushing facility close to the
mining site presents 3 (three) alternatives: the construction of the facility by the
company (capital expenditure) using its own funds, the construction of the facility
by the company using leasing (loan), and the construction of the facility through a
partnership with a third party under a rental scheme. The financial model shows
all the feasibility parameters such as NPV, IRR, PI, and PBP across all scenarios.
The research methodology involves analyzing problem trees and stakeholders to
uncover business complexities and identify the root causes of issues. Qualitative
data collection was conducted through semi-structured interviews. All alternatives
were evaluated using Value-Focused Thinking (VFT), and the Analytic Hierarchy
Process (AHP) method was employed to determine the best alternative, assisted by
the Super Decision application.
|
|---|