A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients

Abstrac In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic sub...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Indri Lakhsmi Putri, -
Format: Article PeerReviewed
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.unair.ac.id/134434/1/2.%20artikel%20karya%20ilmiah%20syarat%20khusus.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/134434/
https://journals.lww.com/tcmj/fulltext/2024/36010/a_meta_analysis_of_alveolar_bone_grafting_using.6.aspx
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Airlangga
Language: English
id id-langga.134434
record_format dspace
spelling id-langga.1344342024-11-28T03:35:54Z https://repository.unair.ac.id/134434/ A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients Indri Lakhsmi Putri, - R5-130.5 General works Abstrac In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6–12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6–12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6–12 months of follow‑up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed‑effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval − 0.301–0.730; P = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews. Keywords: Alveolar bone grafting, Bone substitutes, Bone transplantation, Cleft lip with or without cleft palate, Medical care Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2024-01-29 Article PeerReviewed text en https://repository.unair.ac.id/134434/1/2.%20artikel%20karya%20ilmiah%20syarat%20khusus.pdf Indri Lakhsmi Putri, - (2024) A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients. Tzu Chi Medical Journal, 36. pp. 53-58. ISSN Tzu Chi Medical Journal https://journals.lww.com/tcmj/fulltext/2024/36010/a_meta_analysis_of_alveolar_bone_grafting_using.6.aspx 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_125_23
institution Universitas Airlangga
building Universitas Airlangga Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider Universitas Airlangga Library
collection UNAIR Repository
language English
topic R5-130.5 General works
spellingShingle R5-130.5 General works
Indri Lakhsmi Putri, -
A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
description Abstrac In individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP), an alveolar bone graft (ABG) is carried out for alveolar cleft closure. Several sources for ABG include autologous bone, xenologous bone, and alloplastic substitutes. Autologous bone has been the preferred source for ABG. Alloplastic substitutes might serve as an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes between autologous and alloplastic as sources for ABG. This study made use of eight web databases. Randomized control trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included. CLP patients with alveolar cleft with imaging studies, computed tomography (CT scan) and/or cone beam CT scan, and bone graft volume within 6–12 months postintervention were selected. Bone graft volume within 6–12 months postintervention was assessed. Three studies met the inclusion criteria. After 6–12 months of follow‑up, there were no statistically significant differences in bone graft volume between autologous and alloplastic bone grafts (fixed‑effect model estimate value = 0.21; confidence interval − 0.301–0.730; P = 0.414). The limitations include small research sample sizes, a high likelihood of bias among included studies, and different alloplastic materials from each included study. Autologous and alloplastic bone grafts showed similar effectiveness in alveolar bone grafting. Further clinical trial studies with bigger sample sizes and similar interventions are needed as evidence for future reviews. Keywords: Alveolar bone grafting, Bone substitutes, Bone transplantation, Cleft lip with or without cleft palate, Medical care
format Article
PeerReviewed
author Indri Lakhsmi Putri, -
author_facet Indri Lakhsmi Putri, -
author_sort Indri Lakhsmi Putri, -
title A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
title_short A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
title_full A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
title_sort meta-analysis of alveolar bone grafting using bone substitutes in cleft lip and palate patients
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
publishDate 2024
url https://repository.unair.ac.id/134434/1/2.%20artikel%20karya%20ilmiah%20syarat%20khusus.pdf
https://repository.unair.ac.id/134434/
https://journals.lww.com/tcmj/fulltext/2024/36010/a_meta_analysis_of_alveolar_bone_grafting_using.6.aspx
_version_ 1817579329659338752