KAJIAN HUKUM ATAS PENERAPAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR : 33 TAHUN 2006 TENTANG PERUBAHAN PERATURAN PEMERINTAH NOMOR 14 TAHUN 2005 TENTANG TATA CARA PENGHAPUSAN PIUTANG NEGARA/DAERAH TERHADAP PENGURUSAN PIUTANG MACET BUMN
The study was conducted to determine 1) the procedures and mechanisms for resolving State-Owned bad receivables prior to the enactment of Government Regulation No. 33 of 2006, 2) to state action in completing the breakdown of self receivables based on Government Regulation No. 33 of 2006, 3) knowing...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/118524/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=58499 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | The study was conducted to determine 1) the procedures and mechanisms
for resolving State-Owned bad receivables prior to the enactment of Government
Regulation No. 33 of 2006, 2) to state action in completing the breakdown of self
receivables based on Government Regulation No. 33 of 2006, 3) knowing the
constraints faced by State-Owned and state efforts in completing the breakdown of
accounts receivable after the enactment of Government Regulation No. 33 of
2006. This research study was conducted based on data sources from books,
magazines, law and economics, newspapers, scientific papers, articles and
resources from the field to conduct interviews directly to respondents and
interviewees who have been determined.
This study is based on source data from books, magazines, law and
economics, newspapers, scientific papers, articles and resources from the field
interviews with respondents and informants who have been determined. Data
obtained from field research includes primary data related to the mechanisms and
procedures for bad debt settlement, obstacles and constraints faced by the state
and the efforts that have been made.
Based on the results of the discussion is known that the receivables
management of State-Owned stalled before the enactment of Government
Regulation No. 33 of 2006 by Affairs Committee of State Receivable (PUPN)
governed by PUPN established by Law No. 49 Prp Year 1960 On the State
Receivable Affairs Committee, where the state receivables are included in the
definition of the state so that the settlement of accounts receivable jammed state is
the state that must be done through settlement accounts PUPN stalled after the
issuance of PP No. 33 of 2006 which came into force on October 6, 2006, the state
management of accounts receivable can be carried out independently by the state
according to the "mechanism of the corporation" under the Act on Limited
Liability Companies ( Law 1/1995 jo Law 40/2007) and Law on Enterprises (Law
19/2003) and its implementing regulations. State-Owned still face obstacles in the
settlement of accounts receivable bad after exerts authority / discretion to the state
to administer / manage / resolve any claims which the state according to
Regulation No. 33 of 2006, among others, the difference in outlook between the
state / local enterprises with law enforcement officials in the field see that the
legal basis for settlement of accounts jams through the corporate mechanism was
weak because it is based on the PP. 33 of 2006. Given these problems stem from
the law, then the solution must also be through the mechanism of revision, or by
replacing the Act No. 49 of 1960 related to the Act states that the new
management of receivables. |
|---|