ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PROBLEM BASED LEARNING: STUDI KASUS TUNGGAL DI FAKULTAS KEDOKTERAN UNIVERSITAS INDONESIA
Background: The new paradigm in medical education has moved toward into a constructive, collaborative, contextual and self directed learning. These concepts have been covered by problem-based learning (PBL). Until now, there are still many differences in understanding this learning strategy. Therefo...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/119907/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=59913 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Background: The new paradigm in medical education has moved toward into a
constructive, collaborative, contextual and self directed learning. These concepts have
been covered by problem-based learning (PBL). Until now, there are still many
differences in understanding this learning strategy. Therefore, it may cause problems
in the implementation, so that the effectiveness of PBL is still in question.
Objective: The aim of this study is to understand the implementation of PBL at
medical education institution comprehensively
Participants
Method: The study is a mix method (case study, embedded design) research.
were staff members and students of FMUI. Participants of the qualitative
study were sampled using purposive sampling method. For quantitative studies,
participantss were the 2
nd
,4
th
and 6
th
semester students and their facilitators involved.
Results: From each level and inter level of educational organization, four theories of
PBL implementation were developed. At the institution level, the policy of
competency-based curriculum along with student-centered learning was instructed by
the Ministry of National Education. Leadership and leaders commitment played an
important role in motivating the staff in conducting the curriculum change. However,
there were some difficulties in preparing, implementing and evaluating the
curriculum. At the faculty level, the management of change has been well prepared,
although coordination, communication and commitment among the module� team
members and staff should be improved. At the individual level, different opinions
were detected among staff members and students concerning PBL, eventhough the
group discussions covered constructive, contextual, collaborative and self directed
learning. Students were able to activate their prior knowledge and learned basic
sciences thoroughly in depth. The 4
th
and 6
th
semester students were more focused to
problem solving than problem-based learning. Factors influencing the discussion
process were facilitators, students, problems, resources and other learning activities.
Based on the results, Conclusions: theories of PBL implementation at different levels
of organization were developed to be considered when an institution would
implement or evaluate PBL. |
---|