EVALUASI DIRI PERILAKU PROFESIONAL DI INSTITUSI SEKOLAH TINGGI ILMU KESEHATAN GUNA BANGSA YOGYAKARTA
Background: Education world has a very important role in improving the quality of human resources, as it is the environment in which the process of the formation of professional behavior through a series of teaching and learning process. Professional behavior should be clearly seen as an aspect of p...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/122823/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=62931 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
Summary: | Background: Education world has a very important role in improving the
quality of human resources, as it is the environment in which the process
of the formation of professional behavior through a series of teaching and
learning process. Professional behavior should be clearly seen as an
aspect of personal identity and character developed over time. Based on
this, the focus of professionalism began to shift from individual to the
institution and stated that professionalism must be embedded in an
educational institution with a complete integration of the culture of
professionalism that involves the institution leader, staffs, lecturers, and
students. The purpose of this study is to investigate the professional
behavior of the institution of Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Guna Bangsa
Yogyakarta.
Methods: This study is a descriptive qualitative research. Subjects were
the institutional leader, lecturers, staffs and students are determined by
purposive sampling. Interview instruments include altruism, honor and
integrity, caring and compassion, respect for others, responsibility and
accountability, excellence and scholarship, and leadership. Participant at
the data collection focused group discussion (FGD) is 10 persons and on
interview data collection is 21 persons. Efforts to achieve the credibility of
the informant are done by triangulation and discussions with colleagues.
Research supervisor role as auditors, maintain dependency and certainty
degree of this research.
Results: Participants considered that the lecturers, staffs, students and
institutional leader have done with the guidance of a good, high integrity,
good communication, mutual respect, responsibility and provide
exemplary. However, some behavioral components still require
improvement such as the level of lecturers� discipline, staffs� job and
responsibility distribution, student discipline and responsibility, and
supervisor leadership patterns.
Conclusion: As there are still some components of professional behavior
that needs any improvement, requires institutions to increase selfunderstanding
and awareness to professional behavior. Institutions need
to consider any strategies to be taken to overcome any problems faced by
the institution to achieve professional behavior. |
---|