PUTUSAN PERDAMAIAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN DI PENGADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL YOGYAKARTA (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN PERDAMAIAN NOMOR 07/G/2012/PHI.YK.)

• Main Authors: , Adiwidya Yowana, , Dr. Tata Wijayanta, S.H., M.Hum.
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2014
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/130502/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=70925
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

This research is aimed at examining and analyzing the Conciliation Verdict Number 07/G/2012/PHI.Yk if it is associated with Article 4 of the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 1 of 2008 and its legal consequences and examining the factors that caused the Industrial Relations Court of Yogyakarta resolved the dispute through a conciliation in the Conciliation Verdict Number 07/G/2012/PHI.Yk. This research is an empirical-normative research employing library research and field research. Methods and instruments of data collection in the library research includeddocumentation methodand documentation study, while in the field research included interviewand interview guides. Data were analyzed qualitatively. The results of research and discussion indicate that Article 4 Number 1 of 2008 PERMA is ambiguous, so that the Conciliation Verdict Number 07/G/2012/PHI.Yk. did not conflict with the laws and regulations and had permanent legal force. The factors that caused the conciliation in the Industrial Relations Court of Yogyakarta were that Article 4 of PERMA Number 1 of 2008 was ambiguous, so that the Industrial Relations Court of Yogyakarta referred to Article 130 of HIR