Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure

Purpose: To examine three dimensions of organisational change capacity (OCC) which have been proposed sequentially in the following order: OCC for change will affect process capacity for change and develop context capacity for change. Specifically, this study explores the moderating effects of coerc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sukoco, Badri Munir, Supriharyanti, Elisabeth, Sabar, Sabar, Susanto, Ely, Nasution, Reza Ashari, Daryanto, Arief
Format: Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed
Language:English
Published: Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284325/1/10-1108_APJBA-11-2020-0428.pdf
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284325/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111395282&doi=10.1108%2fAPJBA-11-2020-0428&partnerID=40&md5=68ea6d42a2e547f0841a385b401658c7
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada
Language: English
id id-ugm-repo.284325
record_format dspace
spelling id-ugm-repo.2843252023-12-11T08:04:29Z https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284325/ Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure Sukoco, Badri Munir Supriharyanti, Elisabeth Sabar, Sabar Susanto, Ely Nasution, Reza Ashari Daryanto, Arief Policy and Administration Purpose: To examine three dimensions of organisational change capacity (OCC) which have been proposed sequentially in the following order: OCC for change will affect process capacity for change and develop context capacity for change. Specifically, this study explores the moderating effects of coercive pressure. Design/methodology/approach: To test the proposed hypotheses, this study conducted survey among middle-level leaders of the 11 top universities (autonomous higher education institutions – AHEIs) in Indonesia. This study used a sample of 92 respondents, deans 21 and vice deans 71 of 11 top Indonesian universities. To test data processing using the SmartPLS 3.0 tool. Findings: The findings indicate that learning capacity for change is the starting point of OCC, and it influences process capacity and context capacity for change. Coercive pressure strengthens the relationship between learning capacity and context capacity for change. Further, context capacity for change determines organisational performance. Originality/value: This study empirically examines the OCC construction mechanism as follows: learning capacity for change influences process capacity for change and then has an effect on the OCC for change, which ultimately affects organisational performance. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited. Emerald Group Holdings Ltd. 2022 Conference or Workshop Item PeerReviewed application/pdf en https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284325/1/10-1108_APJBA-11-2020-0428.pdf Sukoco, Badri Munir and Supriharyanti, Elisabeth and Sabar, Sabar and Susanto, Ely and Nasution, Reza Ashari and Daryanto, Arief (2022) Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure. In: Scopus. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111395282&doi=10.1108%2fAPJBA-11-2020-0428&partnerID=40&md5=68ea6d42a2e547f0841a385b401658c7
institution Universitas Gadjah Mada
building UGM Library
continent Asia
country Indonesia
Indonesia
content_provider UGM Library
collection Repository Civitas UGM
language English
topic Policy and Administration
spellingShingle Policy and Administration
Sukoco, Badri Munir
Supriharyanti, Elisabeth
Sabar, Sabar
Susanto, Ely
Nasution, Reza Ashari
Daryanto, Arief
Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
description Purpose: To examine three dimensions of organisational change capacity (OCC) which have been proposed sequentially in the following order: OCC for change will affect process capacity for change and develop context capacity for change. Specifically, this study explores the moderating effects of coercive pressure. Design/methodology/approach: To test the proposed hypotheses, this study conducted survey among middle-level leaders of the 11 top universities (autonomous higher education institutions – AHEIs) in Indonesia. This study used a sample of 92 respondents, deans 21 and vice deans 71 of 11 top Indonesian universities. To test data processing using the SmartPLS 3.0 tool. Findings: The findings indicate that learning capacity for change is the starting point of OCC, and it influences process capacity and context capacity for change. Coercive pressure strengthens the relationship between learning capacity and context capacity for change. Further, context capacity for change determines organisational performance. Originality/value: This study empirically examines the OCC construction mechanism as follows: learning capacity for change influences process capacity for change and then has an effect on the OCC for change, which ultimately affects organisational performance. © 2021, Emerald Publishing Limited.
format Conference or Workshop Item
PeerReviewed
author Sukoco, Badri Munir
Supriharyanti, Elisabeth
Sabar, Sabar
Susanto, Ely
Nasution, Reza Ashari
Daryanto, Arief
author_facet Sukoco, Badri Munir
Supriharyanti, Elisabeth
Sabar, Sabar
Susanto, Ely
Nasution, Reza Ashari
Daryanto, Arief
author_sort Sukoco, Badri Munir
title Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
title_short Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
title_full Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
title_fullStr Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
title_full_unstemmed Organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
title_sort organisational change capacity and performance: the moderating effect of coercive pressure
publisher Emerald Group Holdings Ltd.
publishDate 2022
url https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284325/1/10-1108_APJBA-11-2020-0428.pdf
https://repository.ugm.ac.id/284325/
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85111395282&doi=10.1108%2fAPJBA-11-2020-0428&partnerID=40&md5=68ea6d42a2e547f0841a385b401658c7
_version_ 1787137350010142720