ANALISIS YURIDIS MENGENAI KEBERADAAN TIGA BUAH PERJANJIAN KERJA BERSAMA (PKB) DI PT �X� DI TINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 13 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KETENAGAKERJAAN

• Main Authors: , Slamet Wahyudi, , Dr. Ari Hernawan S.H., M.Hum.
• Format: Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed
• Published: [Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada 2012
• Subjects: ETD
• Online Access: https://repository.ugm.ac.id/98459/; http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=54831
• Institution: Universitas Gadjah Mada

A Collective Labour Agreement (CLA) is an important document for company and an employee. Its aim is to ensure that the welfare of employees and their families is maintained and improved. It is also to ensure a workplace in condusive to increasing productivity. Collective Labour Agreement consists of works condition, rights and obligation of both. In one company is only one Collective Labour Agreement. Analysis juridical of three Collective Labour Agreement in PT �X�, the company was signed three Collective Labour Agreement, it was Senakin Mine Project, Sangata Mine and Satui Mine. Which is PT �X� have three Collective Labour Agreement and one Company Regulation. This research will observes aplication of three Collective Labour Agreement and Company Regullation in PT �X�. The research method is the juridical empirical method, which is observes an application of the Collective Labour Agreement and application of Company Regulation in PT �X� comply with Act Number 13/2003 about Manpowership and Kepmenakertrans Number 48/2004 and other related policy and regulation. Upon the thesis writing, the Author used the approach of juridical empirical method that is a method or procedure used to solve the obstacle, which starts in advance with the examining of the secondary data and continues with examining of the primary data on the field. The obtained research result, Collective Labour Agreement in PT �X� is an illegal action. The negotiation didn�t comply with Manpowership act No. 13/2003, three Collective Labour Agreement causing differ guidance for schedule, roster, working hours and holiday doesn�t match each other. Company Regulation doesn�t better than Collective Labour Agreement guidance.