PERBEDAAN PENGARUH RUMINASI KEMARAHAN DENGAN AFEK NEGATIF TERHADAP PUTUSAN HUKUMAN PADA KASUS KORUPSI
The role of emotion in trial verdict is considered to be factor that would lead to injustice. This research seeks to find out the difference of the effect between anger rumination manipulation and negative affect manipulation in corruption case verdict. This research conducted with experiment, with...
Saved in:
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Theses and Dissertations NonPeerReviewed |
| Published: |
[Yogyakarta] : Universitas Gadjah Mada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://repository.ugm.ac.id/99295/ http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=55681 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Institution: | Universitas Gadjah Mada |
| Summary: | The role of emotion in trial verdict is considered to be factor that would
lead to injustice. This research seeks to find out the difference of the
effect between anger rumination manipulation and negative affect
manipulation in corruption case verdict.
This research conducted with experiment, with post test only with
nonequivalent control group design. Subjek consist of 88 law school
students, which derived into three groups: anger rumination, negative
affect and control group. This research is using emotion manipulation in
order to see the effect in the dynamics of corruption verdict.
Result shows that there is significant difference in crime verdict between
three groups (F=4,303 |
|---|