Protective effects of mouthwash formulations of syzygium polyantha (L.) and piper betel (L.) on oral microbiota-induced gingivitis

• Main Authors: Putri, Megananda Hiranya, Nurjanah, Neneng, Laela, Dewi Sodja, Sukmasari, Susi
• Format: Article
• Language: English; English; English
• Published: PagePress Publications 2024
• Subjects: QR Microbiology; RK Dentistry; RK318 Oral and Dental Medicine. Pathology. Diseases-Therapeutics-General Works
• Online Access: http://irep.iium.edu.my/113847/1/113847_Protective%20effects%20of%20mouthwash%20formulations.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/113847/6/113847_Protective%20effects%20of%20mouthwash%20formulations_SCOPUS.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/113847/7/113847_Protective%20effects%20of%20mouthwash%20formulations_WOS.pdf; http://irep.iium.edu.my/113847/; https://www.pagepressjournals.org/hls/article/view/11768
• Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia

Using a combination of natural ingredients as a mouthwash was expected to have a synergistic effect in preventing gingivitis, a common oral disease. The objective of this study was to elucidate the anti-inflammatory effect of different proportions of mouthwash infusions: F1 (75% Syzygium polyantha and 25% Piper betle) and F2 (25% Syzygium polyantha and 75% Piper betle) on oral microbiota causing gingivitis. Twenty-four Rattus norvegicus were divided into four groups, and bacteria were injected into the periodontal sulcus. The anti-inflammatory effect was assessed by calculating the reduced number of polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes. A cytotoxicity test was carried out on the normal fibroblast cell line 3T3-L1. There were no significant differences in the decreased number of PMN leukocytes (p = 0.079 > 0.05). Both F1 and F2 showed results of cell viability approaching 100% of living cells at concentrations of 0.29 ppm and 0.04 ppm, equivalent to 0.058% and 0.029%, respectively. This study concluded that both formulations of Syzygium polyantha and Piper betle have potential effects on gingivitis prevention. They had an effectiveness level almost similar to Chlorhexidine gluconate 2%. The toxicity value of formulation F1 is superior to that of formulation F2. Further studies concerning the toxicity of the mixtures and their effect on oral biofilm are needed.