Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers

Various methods have been described to extract RNA from adherent mammalian cells. RNA isolation in conjunction with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a valuable tool used to study gene expression profiling. This approach is now being used in mammalian cell bioprocessing to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Packeer Mohamed, Vasila, Hashim, Yumi Zuhanis Has-Yun, Amid, A., Mel, Maizirwan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IIUM Press 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:http://irep.iium.edu.my/38026/1/Paper_-_Packeer_Mohamed_2014_%28IIUM_EJ%29.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38026/
http://journals.iium.edu.my/ejournal/index.php/iiumej
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
Language: English
id my.iium.irep.38026
record_format dspace
spelling my.iium.irep.380262014-10-22T10:41:49Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/38026/ Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers Packeer Mohamed, Vasila Hashim, Yumi Zuhanis Has-Yun Amid, A. Mel, Maizirwan Q Science (General) Various methods have been described to extract RNA from adherent mammalian cells. RNA isolation in conjunction with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a valuable tool used to study gene expression profiling. This approach is now being used in mammalian cell bioprocessing to help understand and improve the system. The objective of this study was to compare and determine the most suitable RNA extraction method for CHO-K1 cells in a setting where a relatively large amount of samples was involved. Total RNA was extracted using Total RNA purification kit (without DNase treatment; Norgen, Canada) and RNeasy mini kit (with DNase treatment; Qiagen, USA) respectively. The extracted RNA was then reverse transcribed, and the cDNA was subjected to PCR-amplifying 18S. Yield from RNeasy kit was significantly higher (0.316 ± 0.033 μg/μl; p=0.004) than Total RNA purification kit (0.177 ± 0.0243 μg/μl). However, RNA purity for both methods was close to 2.0 and there was no significant difference between the methods. Total RNA purification kit is less expensive than RNeasy kit. Since there is no DNase treatment step in the former, extraction time for RNA is shorter. When the extracted RNA was subjected to RT-PCR, both methods were able to show detection of 18S at 219 bp. Therefore, this study demonstrates that both protocols are suitable for RNA extraction for CHO-K1 cells. RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) is recommended if higher yields is the primary concern and Total RNA Purification kit (Norgen) is recommended if time and cost are concerned. IIUM Press 2014 Article REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/38026/1/Paper_-_Packeer_Mohamed_2014_%28IIUM_EJ%29.pdf Packeer Mohamed, Vasila and Hashim, Yumi Zuhanis Has-Yun and Amid, A. and Mel, Maizirwan (2014) Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers. IIUM Engineering Journal, 15 (1). pp. 33-39. ISSN 1511-788X http://journals.iium.edu.my/ejournal/index.php/iiumej
institution Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia
building IIUM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider International Islamic University Malaysia
content_source IIUM Repository (IREP)
url_provider http://irep.iium.edu.my/
language English
topic Q Science (General)
spellingShingle Q Science (General)
Packeer Mohamed, Vasila
Hashim, Yumi Zuhanis Has-Yun
Amid, A.
Mel, Maizirwan
Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers
description Various methods have been described to extract RNA from adherent mammalian cells. RNA isolation in conjunction with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is a valuable tool used to study gene expression profiling. This approach is now being used in mammalian cell bioprocessing to help understand and improve the system. The objective of this study was to compare and determine the most suitable RNA extraction method for CHO-K1 cells in a setting where a relatively large amount of samples was involved. Total RNA was extracted using Total RNA purification kit (without DNase treatment; Norgen, Canada) and RNeasy mini kit (with DNase treatment; Qiagen, USA) respectively. The extracted RNA was then reverse transcribed, and the cDNA was subjected to PCR-amplifying 18S. Yield from RNeasy kit was significantly higher (0.316 ± 0.033 μg/μl; p=0.004) than Total RNA purification kit (0.177 ± 0.0243 μg/μl). However, RNA purity for both methods was close to 2.0 and there was no significant difference between the methods. Total RNA purification kit is less expensive than RNeasy kit. Since there is no DNase treatment step in the former, extraction time for RNA is shorter. When the extracted RNA was subjected to RT-PCR, both methods were able to show detection of 18S at 219 bp. Therefore, this study demonstrates that both protocols are suitable for RNA extraction for CHO-K1 cells. RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen) is recommended if higher yields is the primary concern and Total RNA Purification kit (Norgen) is recommended if time and cost are concerned.
format Article
author Packeer Mohamed, Vasila
Hashim, Yumi Zuhanis Has-Yun
Amid, A.
Mel, Maizirwan
author_facet Packeer Mohamed, Vasila
Hashim, Yumi Zuhanis Has-Yun
Amid, A.
Mel, Maizirwan
author_sort Packeer Mohamed, Vasila
title Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers
title_short Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers
title_full Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers
title_fullStr Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two total RNA extraction protocols from CHO-K1 cells for RT-PCR: cutoff cost for researchers
title_sort comparison of two total rna extraction protocols from cho-k1 cells for rt-pcr: cutoff cost for researchers
publisher IIUM Press
publishDate 2014
url http://irep.iium.edu.my/38026/1/Paper_-_Packeer_Mohamed_2014_%28IIUM_EJ%29.pdf
http://irep.iium.edu.my/38026/
http://journals.iium.edu.my/ejournal/index.php/iiumej
_version_ 1643611329130397696