Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment
It is not about the tools, it’s using the tools to facilitate learning. This research explores the nature of the outcomes experienced by students for using audience response system technology in the classroom. Specifically, this study answers the question “What are the impacts of ARS on performance...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference or Workshop Item |
Language: | English English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/1/41462.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/4/41462_audience_response_scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7020639 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
Language: | English English |
id |
my.iium.irep.41462 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
my.iium.irep.414622018-05-24T05:40:54Z http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/ Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan Abdullah, Lili Marziana Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani T Technology (General) It is not about the tools, it’s using the tools to facilitate learning. This research explores the nature of the outcomes experienced by students for using audience response system technology in the classroom. Specifically, this study answers the question “What are the impacts of ARS on performance outcomes in secondary level education?” A personally administer questionnaire and quasi-experimental method was used. Kirkpatrick’s four-level model was used to measure the performance outcome of the student in computer studies class at Adni International Islamic School. The finding shows that, student reaction outcome was positive. Student learning outcome improved but student behavior slightly changes due to the utilization of ARS. The post-test result outcome shows that there is no significant difference between students who received instruction through the audience response system and students who received instruction through non-technology based methods. 2014-11-17 Conference or Workshop Item REM application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/1/41462.pdf application/pdf en http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/4/41462_audience_response_scopus.pdf Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan and Abdullah, Lili Marziana and Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani (2014) Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment. In: 5th International Conference on Information & Communication Technology for the Muslim World (ICT4M), 17th - 19th November 2014, Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7020639 |
institution |
Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia |
building |
IIUM Library |
collection |
Institutional Repository |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Malaysia |
content_provider |
International Islamic University Malaysia |
content_source |
IIUM Repository (IREP) |
url_provider |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/ |
language |
English English |
topic |
T Technology (General) |
spellingShingle |
T Technology (General) Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan Abdullah, Lili Marziana Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
description |
It is not about the tools, it’s using the tools to facilitate learning. This research explores the nature of the outcomes experienced by students for using audience response system technology in the classroom. Specifically, this study answers the question “What are the impacts of ARS on performance outcomes in secondary level education?” A
personally administer questionnaire and quasi-experimental
method was used. Kirkpatrick’s four-level model was used to
measure the performance outcome of the student in computer
studies class at Adni International Islamic School. The finding shows that, student reaction outcome was positive. Student learning outcome improved but student behavior slightly changes due to the utilization of ARS. The post-test result outcome shows that there is no significant difference between students who received instruction through the audience response system and students who received instruction through non-technology based methods. |
format |
Conference or Workshop Item |
author |
Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan Abdullah, Lili Marziana Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani |
author_facet |
Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan Abdullah, Lili Marziana Montadzah Ambag, Abdulgani |
author_sort |
Jonathan Mamangkian, Mantikayan |
title |
Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
title_short |
Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
title_full |
Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
title_fullStr |
Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
title_full_unstemmed |
Audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
title_sort |
audience response system utilization outcome in secondary school environment |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/1/41462.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/4/41462_audience_response_scopus.pdf http://irep.iium.edu.my/41462/ http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=7020639 |
_version_ |
1643612027066777600 |