Is the risk of tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity similar in treatment-naïve compared to treatment-experienced patients?

Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is the recommended first-line nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); however, its use is associated with nephrotoxicity. Aim: To assess if the risks of renal impairment were similar in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Low, Joo Zheng, Khoo, Su Pei, Nor Azmi, Nuruljannah, Chong, Meng Li, Sulaiman, Helmi, Azwa, Iskandar, Tan, Ching Hooi, Kamarulzaman, Adeeba, Rajasuriar, Reena
Format: Article
Published: Wiley 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.um.edu.my/21392/
https://doi.org/10.1002/jppr.1392
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaya
Description
Summary:Background: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is the recommended first-line nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) in the management of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV); however, its use is associated with nephrotoxicity. Aim: To assess if the risks of renal impairment were similar in treatment-naïve compared to treatment-experienced patients initiating tenofovir given their different background clinical characteristics. Method: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at the University Malaya Medical Centre, Malaysia and included all HIV-infected adults who received tenofovir for at least 3 months and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >60 mL/min at tenofovir initiation. The incidence of renal impairment was defined as a 25% decrease in eGFR from baseline or the development of chronic kidney disease. Clinical and demographic characteristics were extracted from medical records. Risk factors associated with tenofovir-induced renal impairment were determined using multivariate logistic regression. Results: This study included 314 patients and almost half of them (49%) were treatment-naïve at tenofovir initiation. The majority of patients were male (89.5%) with a median (interquartile range) baseline creatinine clearance of 99.1 mL/min (85.0–114.0). Thirty (9.4%) patients developed tenofovir-induced renal impairment and the incidence rate was higher in treatment-experienced versus treatment-naïve patients (7.0 vs 3.3 cases/100 person-years, p = 0.049). Risk factors associated with tenofovir-induced nephrotoxicity in multivariate analysis were older age (p = 0.001), anaemia (p = 0.027), concurrent hypertension (p = 0.014) and higher baseline eGFR (p = 0.007). Conclusion: Treatment experience was not an independent risk factor but was rather confounded by multiple characteristics associated with an increased risk of TDF-induced nephrotoxicity. Monitoring all patients presenting with these risks regardless of treatment experience is crucial.