Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules

A comparative study on the stability and the potential of alginate and pectin based capsules for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium was conducted. The capsule cores, made of three types of materials, i.e. ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The mec...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Voo, Wan Ping
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/1/24%20PAGES.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/2/FULLTEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Malaysia Sabah
Language: English
English
id my.ums.eprints.39138
record_format eprints
spelling my.ums.eprints.391382024-07-26T01:16:00Z https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/ Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules Voo, Wan Ping TP248.13-248.65 Biotechnology A comparative study on the stability and the potential of alginate and pectin based capsules for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium was conducted. The capsule cores, made of three types of materials, i.e. ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The mechanical strength of ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate capsules was 2.5 and 4.3 times, respectively, of that of ca-alginate capsule. The pectin based capsules were found to be more stable than that of the alginate based capsules and their stability was further improved by chitosan coating. However, double layer coating of capsules did not improve the capsule stability due to the competing of polyanion material for chitosan binding, which had weakened the first layer coating. The cell concentration in pectin based capsules was comparable to that of the alginate based capsules. The maximum cell concentration of 1 x 109 CFU/ml was obtained with uncoated ca-alginate/pectinate capsules after two fermentation cycles. Cell concentration in capsules could be influenced by the gel network density since it determines the capsule stability and structural properties. On the other hand, pectin based capsules was found to give significantly lower cell concentration in the growth medium for the initial fermentation cycles due to its higher capsule stability if compared to that of alginate capsules. In conclusion, pectin was found to be potential encapsulation material for probiotic cell production owing to its stability, favourable microenvironment for cell growth as well as its potential to control the release of cells from capsules. 2011 Thesis NonPeerReviewed text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/1/24%20PAGES.pdf text en https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/2/FULLTEXT.pdf Voo, Wan Ping (2011) Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules. Masters thesis, Universiti Malaysia Sabah.
institution Universiti Malaysia Sabah
building UMS Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Malaysia Sabah
content_source UMS Institutional Repository
url_provider http://eprints.ums.edu.my/
language English
English
topic TP248.13-248.65 Biotechnology
spellingShingle TP248.13-248.65 Biotechnology
Voo, Wan Ping
Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
description A comparative study on the stability and the potential of alginate and pectin based capsules for production of poultry probiotic cells using MRS medium was conducted. The capsule cores, made of three types of materials, i.e. ca-alginate, ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate, were compared. The mechanical strength of ca-pectinate and ca-alginate/pectinate capsules was 2.5 and 4.3 times, respectively, of that of ca-alginate capsule. The pectin based capsules were found to be more stable than that of the alginate based capsules and their stability was further improved by chitosan coating. However, double layer coating of capsules did not improve the capsule stability due to the competing of polyanion material for chitosan binding, which had weakened the first layer coating. The cell concentration in pectin based capsules was comparable to that of the alginate based capsules. The maximum cell concentration of 1 x 109 CFU/ml was obtained with uncoated ca-alginate/pectinate capsules after two fermentation cycles. Cell concentration in capsules could be influenced by the gel network density since it determines the capsule stability and structural properties. On the other hand, pectin based capsules was found to give significantly lower cell concentration in the growth medium for the initial fermentation cycles due to its higher capsule stability if compared to that of alginate capsules. In conclusion, pectin was found to be potential encapsulation material for probiotic cell production owing to its stability, favourable microenvironment for cell growth as well as its potential to control the release of cells from capsules.
format Thesis
author Voo, Wan Ping
author_facet Voo, Wan Ping
author_sort Voo, Wan Ping
title Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
title_short Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
title_full Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
title_fullStr Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
title_full_unstemmed Immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
title_sort immobilization of probiotic cells in alginate and pectinate capsules
publishDate 2011
url https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/1/24%20PAGES.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/2/FULLTEXT.pdf
https://eprints.ums.edu.my/id/eprint/39138/
_version_ 1805887931292844032