Is the Cascading Training Model Effective for Continuous Professional Development? A Review of Teachers’ Experiences
Continuous professional development (CPD) plays an integral role in educational reform and in the development and enhancement of teachers’ pedagogical skills and knowledge. In Malaysia, the cascade training model is often preferred for CPD programmes in public secondary schools. This may be due to...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/36117/1/1U9hmAuVWRddoWRfrVht-7KvLxh-i8n5z http://ir.unimas.my/id/eprint/36117/ https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1U9hmAuVWRddoWRfrVht-7KvLxh-i8n5z |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Universiti Malaysia Sarawak |
Language: | English |
Summary: | Continuous professional development (CPD) plays an integral role in educational reform and in the
development and enhancement of teachers’ pedagogical skills and knowledge. In Malaysia, the cascade
training model is often preferred for CPD programmes in public secondary schools. This may be due to
cost effectiveness and reach, where many teachers can be trained in a short timeframe. Critics of the
cascade model of training tend however, point to a risk of knowledge being diluted as it is transferred from
the trainers to the attendees and then to teachers in schools. This paper focuses on documenting the
experiences of Malaysian secondary school English teachers attending school-based assessment (SBA)
CPD training courses using the cascade training model. Data was collected from 16 English teachers from
16 public secondary schools through in-depth semi-structured interviews. The findings indicate that there
were mixed experiences of teachers attending cascade training programs and that of subsequent trainings
that were conducted by attendees of the programmes. These experiences were affected largely by the
quality of the training programme (i.e. design of program curriculum and materials), trainer quality,
participants selected, and follow up support afforded to participants. This paper will culminate with
recommendations for further CPD improvements. |
---|