Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management

Total quality management (TQM) is a philosophy and a system for continuously improving the services and products offered to customers through ongoing refinements in response to continuous feedback. With regards to higher education, quality education needs to be emphasized in ensuring progressive int...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jani H.M.
Other Authors: 13609136000
Format: Conference paper
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Tenaga Nasional
id my.uniten.dspace-30344
record_format dspace
spelling my.uniten.dspace-303442023-12-29T15:46:56Z Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management Jani H.M. 13609136000 Higher Education Intellectual Capacity Building Total Quality Management Information science Learning systems Quality assurance Teaching Total quality management Continuous improvements Education systems Educational systems Formative evaluation Higher education Higher learning In-buildings In-line Intellectual capacity Learning process Mastery learning PDCA cycles Proper learning Quality education Total quality assurance Traditional learning Information management Total quality management (TQM) is a philosophy and a system for continuously improving the services and products offered to customers through ongoing refinements in response to continuous feedback. With regards to higher education, quality education needs to be emphasized in ensuring progressive intellectual capacity building. Both quality assurance and management are critical in ensuring that higher learning institutions provide better services to their primary customers. The continuous improvement and growth focus of TQM would offer more excitement and challenges to students and lecturers as compared to a "good enough" traditional learning environment. In this paper, elements of an education system that focus on total quality assurance and management are discussed. The most important element is to ensure that each staff within the educational system has adequate awareness on quality education. A clear mission and vision must be in place and a proper learning system must be adopted. This paper emphasizes on the mastery learning approach, which is in line with TQM. The learning process follows the Plan, Do, Check, and Act steps or the PDCA cycle. It contains the following steps: Plan, teach (Do), Check (formative evaluation), revised teaching (Act), and Test (summative evaluation). The two main objectives of using TQM in education, which are to improve learning and to improve cost effectiveness, are emphasized. The paper concludes with a framework that can be used as guidelines to total quality assurance and management in higher education. It is hoped that this framework is useful in building intellectual capacity in higher education. � 2011 AICIT. Final 2023-12-29T07:46:56Z 2023-12-29T07:46:56Z 2011 Conference paper 2-s2.0-83755163816 https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-83755163816&partnerID=40&md5=9471e0308dfa81a0089f20a399b8a95a https://irepository.uniten.edu.my/handle/123456789/30344 2 6093456 361 366 Scopus
institution Universiti Tenaga Nasional
building UNITEN Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Tenaga Nasional
content_source UNITEN Institutional Repository
url_provider http://dspace.uniten.edu.my/
topic Higher Education
Intellectual Capacity Building
Total Quality Management
Information science
Learning systems
Quality assurance
Teaching
Total quality management
Continuous improvements
Education systems
Educational systems
Formative evaluation
Higher education
Higher learning
In-buildings
In-line
Intellectual capacity
Learning process
Mastery learning
PDCA cycles
Proper learning
Quality education
Total quality assurance
Traditional learning
Information management
spellingShingle Higher Education
Intellectual Capacity Building
Total Quality Management
Information science
Learning systems
Quality assurance
Teaching
Total quality management
Continuous improvements
Education systems
Educational systems
Formative evaluation
Higher education
Higher learning
In-buildings
In-line
Intellectual capacity
Learning process
Mastery learning
PDCA cycles
Proper learning
Quality education
Total quality assurance
Traditional learning
Information management
Jani H.M.
Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management
description Total quality management (TQM) is a philosophy and a system for continuously improving the services and products offered to customers through ongoing refinements in response to continuous feedback. With regards to higher education, quality education needs to be emphasized in ensuring progressive intellectual capacity building. Both quality assurance and management are critical in ensuring that higher learning institutions provide better services to their primary customers. The continuous improvement and growth focus of TQM would offer more excitement and challenges to students and lecturers as compared to a "good enough" traditional learning environment. In this paper, elements of an education system that focus on total quality assurance and management are discussed. The most important element is to ensure that each staff within the educational system has adequate awareness on quality education. A clear mission and vision must be in place and a proper learning system must be adopted. This paper emphasizes on the mastery learning approach, which is in line with TQM. The learning process follows the Plan, Do, Check, and Act steps or the PDCA cycle. It contains the following steps: Plan, teach (Do), Check (formative evaluation), revised teaching (Act), and Test (summative evaluation). The two main objectives of using TQM in education, which are to improve learning and to improve cost effectiveness, are emphasized. The paper concludes with a framework that can be used as guidelines to total quality assurance and management in higher education. It is hoped that this framework is useful in building intellectual capacity in higher education. � 2011 AICIT.
author2 13609136000
author_facet 13609136000
Jani H.M.
format Conference paper
author Jani H.M.
author_sort Jani H.M.
title Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management
title_short Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management
title_full Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management
title_fullStr Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management
title_full_unstemmed Intellectual capacity building in higher education: Quality assurance and management
title_sort intellectual capacity building in higher education: quality assurance and management
publishDate 2023
_version_ 1806427602412371968