Oral administration of Lactobacillus casei Shirota can ameliorate the adverse effect of an acute aflatoxin exposure in sprague dawley rats

Aflatoxin B₁(AFB₁) is a toxic compound commonly found in some crops with an adverse health effect on human and animals. Some beneficial microorganisms (or probiotics) such as lactic acid bacteria have shown the ability to reduce the bioavailability of aflatoxins and its intestinal absorption. Howeve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nikbakht, Elham, Jamaluddin, Rosita, Sabran, Mohd Redzwan, Khalesi, Saman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hogrefe Verlag GmbH and Co. KG 2019
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/81586/1/Oral%20administration%20of%20Lactobacillus%20casei%20Shirota%20can%20ameliorate%20the%20adverse%20effect%20of%20an%20acute%20aflatoxin%20exposure%20in%20sprague%20dawley%20rats.pdf
http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/81586/
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31056010/
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
Language: English
Description
Summary:Aflatoxin B₁(AFB₁) is a toxic compound commonly found in some crops with an adverse health effect on human and animals. Some beneficial microorganisms (or probiotics) such as lactic acid bacteria have shown the ability to reduce the bioavailability of aflatoxins and its intestinal absorption. However, the dose and duration of aflatoxins exposure and probiotic treatment can influence the ability of probiotics to remove aflatoxins. Therefore, this research aimed to investigate the efficacy of oral probiotic Lactobacillus casei Shirota strain (LcS) induction in an acute exposure to AFB₁ in rats. Experimentally, Sprague Dawley rats were divided into three groups: AFB₁ only (n = 9); AFB₁ treated with LcS (n = 9); and control (no AFB₁ exposure) (n = 6) groups. The blood AFB₁ level of rats treated with LcS was slightly lower than the untreated AFB₁ induced rats (11.12 ± 0.71 vs 10.93 ± 0.69 ng g-1). Also, LcS treatment slightly moderated the liver and kidney biomarkers in AFB₁ induced rats. However, a trend for a significant difference was only observed in ALT of AFB₁ induced rats treated with LcS compared to their counterparts (126.11 ± 36.90 vs 157.36 ± 15.46, p = 0.06). Rats' body weight decreased in all animals force-fed with AFB₁ with no significant difference between LcS treatment compared to the counterpart. In conclusion, this experiment indicated that probiotic LsC was able to slightly ameliorate the adverse effect of an acute exposure to AFB₁ in rats. However, future studies with longer probiotics treatment or higher probiotics dose is required to confirm these findings.