Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective

This study examines the redress mechanisms accessible to aggrieved consumers dealing with various consumer credit providers in Malaysia. The existing legal and institutional framework characterised by the piecemeal approach has led different groups of consumers to varying levels of access, which can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana, Hassan, Rusni, Kassim, Salina, Abu Bakar, Elistina
Format: Article
Published: Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2021
Online Access:http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96517/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15588
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Universiti Putra Malaysia
id my.upm.eprints.96517
record_format eprints
spelling my.upm.eprints.965172023-01-11T08:59:43Z http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96517/ Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana Hassan, Rusni Kassim, Salina Abu Bakar, Elistina This study examines the redress mechanisms accessible to aggrieved consumers dealing with various consumer credit providers in Malaysia. The existing legal and institutional framework characterised by the piecemeal approach has led different groups of consumers to varying levels of access, which can be superior or inferior to one another. The study employs a doctrinal legal research methodology in analysing the two alternative dispute resolution bodies, namely, the Ombudsman for Financial Services, and the Tribunal for Consumer Claims. Primary sources of law, namely, the Consumer Protection Act 1999, the Financial Services Act 2013, the Financial Services(Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulation 2014, the Hire-Purchase Act 1967, the Moneylenders Act 1951, and the Pawnbrokers Act 1972, are meticulously analysed along with secondary sources of law that principally comprise journal articles. The study reveals disparities in terms of access to cheap and simple redress mechanisms by various categories of consumers who are aggrieved by the actions of credit providers. The position of bank consumers and those entering into credit sale is accounted for, as there are particular ADR bodies established under relevant legislations to hear their respective disputes. On the contrary, the position of those who wish to lodge claims against moneylenders, pawnbrokers or credit companies offering hire-purchase is problematic. Several recommendations are proposed to resolve this opacity inter alia by referring to the approach adopted by South Africa. This study is significant in ensuring fair access to inexpensive and hassle-free dispute resolutions for all financial consumers, irrespective of the nature of their consumer credit transactions. Universiti Utara Malaysia Press 2021 Article PeerReviewed Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana and Hassan, Rusni and Kassim, Salina and Abu Bakar, Elistina (2021) Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective. UUM Journal of Legal Studies, 12 (2). 61 - 88. ISSN 2229-984X; ESSN: 0127-9483 https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15588 10.32890/uumjls2021.12.2.4
institution Universiti Putra Malaysia
building UPM Library
collection Institutional Repository
continent Asia
country Malaysia
content_provider Universiti Putra Malaysia
content_source UPM Institutional Repository
url_provider http://psasir.upm.edu.my/
description This study examines the redress mechanisms accessible to aggrieved consumers dealing with various consumer credit providers in Malaysia. The existing legal and institutional framework characterised by the piecemeal approach has led different groups of consumers to varying levels of access, which can be superior or inferior to one another. The study employs a doctrinal legal research methodology in analysing the two alternative dispute resolution bodies, namely, the Ombudsman for Financial Services, and the Tribunal for Consumer Claims. Primary sources of law, namely, the Consumer Protection Act 1999, the Financial Services Act 2013, the Financial Services(Financial Ombudsman Scheme) Regulation 2014, the Hire-Purchase Act 1967, the Moneylenders Act 1951, and the Pawnbrokers Act 1972, are meticulously analysed along with secondary sources of law that principally comprise journal articles. The study reveals disparities in terms of access to cheap and simple redress mechanisms by various categories of consumers who are aggrieved by the actions of credit providers. The position of bank consumers and those entering into credit sale is accounted for, as there are particular ADR bodies established under relevant legislations to hear their respective disputes. On the contrary, the position of those who wish to lodge claims against moneylenders, pawnbrokers or credit companies offering hire-purchase is problematic. Several recommendations are proposed to resolve this opacity inter alia by referring to the approach adopted by South Africa. This study is significant in ensuring fair access to inexpensive and hassle-free dispute resolutions for all financial consumers, irrespective of the nature of their consumer credit transactions.
format Article
author Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
Hassan, Rusni
Kassim, Salina
Abu Bakar, Elistina
spellingShingle Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
Hassan, Rusni
Kassim, Salina
Abu Bakar, Elistina
Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective
author_facet Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
Hassan, Rusni
Kassim, Salina
Abu Bakar, Elistina
author_sort Ilias, Ibtisam @ Ilyana
title Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective
title_short Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective
title_full Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective
title_fullStr Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective
title_full_unstemmed Consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the Malaysia perspective
title_sort consumer credit grievance and redress mechanisms: the malaysia perspective
publisher Universiti Utara Malaysia Press
publishDate 2021
url http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/96517/
https://e-journal.uum.edu.my/index.php/uumjls/article/view/15588
_version_ 1755873908992507904