FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW

This paper investigates the factors that may influence blended learning success in tertiary education. Although blended learning has gained its popularity in many countries all over the world, it is still a quite novel approach of learning and teaching in Vietnam; therefore, it is essential to det...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nguyễn, Thị Thu Hiền
Other Authors: 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS “LINGUISTICS - FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION INTERDISCIPLINARY FIELDS
Format: Working Paper
Language:English
Published: NHÀ XUẤT BẢN ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/67493
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Language: English
id oai:112.137.131.14:VNU_123-67493
record_format dspace
institution Vietnam National University, Hanoi
building VNU Library & Information Center
country Vietnam
collection VNU Digital Repository
language English
topic Blended learning
Factors
Influence
Students’ learning
spellingShingle Blended learning
Factors
Influence
Students’ learning
Nguyễn, Thị Thu Hiền
FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW
description This paper investigates the factors that may influence blended learning success in tertiary education. Although blended learning has gained its popularity in many countries all over the world, it is still a quite novel approach of learning and teaching in Vietnam; therefore, it is essential to determine which factors that may interfere students’ learning in this new approach in order to make some timely preparations and improvements and make it more effective. By carrying out a literature review on a number of articles which have been done during the period of time from 2000 to 2018 from two main databases: ERIC (Educational Resource Information Centre) and ProQuest, some crucial factors have been revealed. After reading these full articles carefully, the researcher have found some common factors and divided them into some major categories including learner dimension (students’ culture of learning as well as their knowledge and skills for independent learning, computer literacy skills), instructor dimension (teachers’ knowledge and skills in employing a blended learning environment, teachers’ attitude and perception), institution dimension (institutional support, technical infrastructure), design dimension (perceived usefulness and perceived easy to use, learning activities), and other factors (educational and monetary resources, culture-related factors). The result of this research will be benefcial not only to the students and the teachers but also to all the stakeholders when applying or planning to apply blended learning approach. Bài báo này tìm hiểu các yếu tố có thể có ảnh hưởng đến việc thành công trong việc học theo mô hình học tập kết hợp của sinh viên ở bậc đại học. Mặc dù mô hình học tập kết hợp đã khá phổ biến trên rất nhiều nước trên thế giới, nó vẫn còn là một mô hình dạy và học khá mới ở Việt Nam. Vì vậy, việc tìm hiểu các yếu tố có thể can thiệp vào việc học của sinh viên theo mô hình này là rất cần thiết để có những sự chuẩn bị và cải thiện kịp thời để làm nó hiệu quả hơn. Bằng việc tổng hợp từ rất nhiều bài báo đã được thực hiện trong giai đoạn từ năm 2000-2018 từ hai nguồn dữ liệu chính: ERIC và ProQuest, một vài yếu tố quan trọng đã được tìm ra. Sau khi đọc các bài báo này một cách kĩ lưỡng, nhà nghiên cứu đã tìm ra một số yếu tố phổ biến được đề cập và đã chia chúng thành các hạng mục lớn bao gồm các yếu tố về người học (văn hóa học tập cũng như kiến thức và kĩ năng cần thiết cho việc học độc lập, kĩ năng sử dụng máy tính), các yếu tố về người dạy (bao gồm kiến thức và kĩ năng để dạy trong môi trường học tập kết hợp, thái độ và quan điểm của giáo viên), các yếu tố về tổ chức (sự hỗ trợ của tổ chức, cơ sở hạ tầng), các yếu tố về thiết kế chương trình học (tính hữu ích và dễ sử dụng, các hoạt động học tập) và một số yếu tố khác (như nguồn tiền dành cho giáo dục, các yếu tố liên quan đến văn hóa). Kết quả của nghiên cứu này sẽ hữu ích không chỉ với sinh viên và giáo viên mà còn đối với tất cả những người liên quan khi áp dụng và chuẩn bị áp dụng mô hình học tập kết hợp.
author2 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS “LINGUISTICS - FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION INTERDISCIPLINARY FIELDS
author_facet 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS “LINGUISTICS - FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION INTERDISCIPLINARY FIELDS
Nguyễn, Thị Thu Hiền
format Working Paper
author Nguyễn, Thị Thu Hiền
author_sort Nguyễn, Thị Thu Hiền
title FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_short FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_full FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_fullStr FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_full_unstemmed FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW
title_sort factors affecting students’ learning success in blended courses in tertiary education- a literature review
publisher NHÀ XUẤT BẢN ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI
publishDate 2019
url http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/67493
_version_ 1680964769568260096
spelling oai:112.137.131.14:VNU_123-674932019-09-30T09:17:19Z FACTORS AFFECTING STUDENTS’ LEARNING SUCCESS IN BLENDED COURSES IN TERTIARY EDUCATION- A LITERATURE REVIEW Nguyễn, Thị Thu Hiền 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS “LINGUISTICS - FOREIGN LANGUAGE EDUCATION INTERDISCIPLINARY FIELDS Trường Đại Học Ngoại Ngữ- ĐHQGHN Blended learning Factors Influence Students’ learning This paper investigates the factors that may influence blended learning success in tertiary education. Although blended learning has gained its popularity in many countries all over the world, it is still a quite novel approach of learning and teaching in Vietnam; therefore, it is essential to determine which factors that may interfere students’ learning in this new approach in order to make some timely preparations and improvements and make it more effective. By carrying out a literature review on a number of articles which have been done during the period of time from 2000 to 2018 from two main databases: ERIC (Educational Resource Information Centre) and ProQuest, some crucial factors have been revealed. After reading these full articles carefully, the researcher have found some common factors and divided them into some major categories including learner dimension (students’ culture of learning as well as their knowledge and skills for independent learning, computer literacy skills), instructor dimension (teachers’ knowledge and skills in employing a blended learning environment, teachers’ attitude and perception), institution dimension (institutional support, technical infrastructure), design dimension (perceived usefulness and perceived easy to use, learning activities), and other factors (educational and monetary resources, culture-related factors). The result of this research will be benefcial not only to the students and the teachers but also to all the stakeholders when applying or planning to apply blended learning approach. Bài báo này tìm hiểu các yếu tố có thể có ảnh hưởng đến việc thành công trong việc học theo mô hình học tập kết hợp của sinh viên ở bậc đại học. Mặc dù mô hình học tập kết hợp đã khá phổ biến trên rất nhiều nước trên thế giới, nó vẫn còn là một mô hình dạy và học khá mới ở Việt Nam. Vì vậy, việc tìm hiểu các yếu tố có thể can thiệp vào việc học của sinh viên theo mô hình này là rất cần thiết để có những sự chuẩn bị và cải thiện kịp thời để làm nó hiệu quả hơn. Bằng việc tổng hợp từ rất nhiều bài báo đã được thực hiện trong giai đoạn từ năm 2000-2018 từ hai nguồn dữ liệu chính: ERIC và ProQuest, một vài yếu tố quan trọng đã được tìm ra. Sau khi đọc các bài báo này một cách kĩ lưỡng, nhà nghiên cứu đã tìm ra một số yếu tố phổ biến được đề cập và đã chia chúng thành các hạng mục lớn bao gồm các yếu tố về người học (văn hóa học tập cũng như kiến thức và kĩ năng cần thiết cho việc học độc lập, kĩ năng sử dụng máy tính), các yếu tố về người dạy (bao gồm kiến thức và kĩ năng để dạy trong môi trường học tập kết hợp, thái độ và quan điểm của giáo viên), các yếu tố về tổ chức (sự hỗ trợ của tổ chức, cơ sở hạ tầng), các yếu tố về thiết kế chương trình học (tính hữu ích và dễ sử dụng, các hoạt động học tập) và một số yếu tố khác (như nguồn tiền dành cho giáo dục, các yếu tố liên quan đến văn hóa). Kết quả của nghiên cứu này sẽ hữu ích không chỉ với sinh viên và giáo viên mà còn đối với tất cả những người liên quan khi áp dụng và chuẩn bị áp dụng mô hình học tập kết hợp. ULIS Mô hình học tập kết hợp, các yếu tố, ảnh hưởng, việc học của sinh viên 2019-09-30T09:17:19Z 2019-09-30T09:17:19Z 2018-11-17 Working Paper 1. Abelson, H. (2008). The creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(2), 164-174. doi: 10.1007/s10956-007-9060-8 2. Alebaikan, R. A. (2010). Perceptions of blended learning in Saudi universities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter. 3. Alebaikan, R. A. (2010). Perceptions of blended learning in Saudi universities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Exeter. 4. Al-Harthi, A. S. (2005). Distance Higher Education Experiences of Arab Gulf Students in the United States: A cultural perspective. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 6(3). 5. Allen, I. E. J. (2003). Sizing the Opportunity: The Quality and Extent of Online Education in the United States, 2002 and 2003. Sloan Consortium (NJ1). Retrieved from htps://eric. ed.gov/?id=ED530060204 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS... 6. Al-Wehaibi, K., Al-Wabil, A., Alshawi, A., & Alshankity, Z. (2008). Barriers to Internet Adoption among Faculty in Saudi Arabian Universities. In proceedings of the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia, and Telecommunications. (pp. 24-33). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. 7. Amrein-Beardsley, A., Foulger, T. S., & Toth, M. (2007). Examining the Development of a Hybrid Degree Program. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(4), 331–357. htps://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2007.10782486 8. An, N. T. H. (2002). Cultural effects on learning and teaching English in Vietnam. The Language Teacher, 26(1), 2-6. 9. Ashwill, M. A. & Diep, T. N. (2004). Vietnam today. Blue Ridge Summit: Nicholas Brealey Publishing. 10. Aycock, A., Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Lessons Learned from the Hybrid Course Project. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). 11. Benson, V. Anderson, D. & Ooms, A. (2011). Educators’ perceptions, atitudes and practices: blended learning in business and management education. Research in Learning Technology, 19(2), 143-154. doi: 10.1080/21567069.2011.586676 12. Bets, K. (2014). Factors influencing faculty participation and retention in online and blended education. Online journal of distance learning administration, 17(1). 13. Bets, K. (2014). Factors influencing faculty participation and retention in online and blended education. Online journal of distance learning administration, 17(1). 14. Bohle Carbonell, K., Dailey-Hebert, A. & Giselaers, W. (2013). Unleashing the creative potential of faculty to create blended learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 18(0), 29-37. doi: htp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.004 15. Borg, S. (2009). Language teacher cognition. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge Guide to Second Language Teacher Education (pp. 163-171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 16. Canh, L. V. (2001). Language and Vietnamese pedagogical contexts. Teacher’s Edition, 11(2), 17-25. 17. Chew, E. (2009). A blended learning model in higher education: A comparative study of blended learning in UK and Malaysia. Doctoral dissertation, University of Glamorgan. 18. Comas-Quinn, A. (2011). Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher: an exploration of teachers’ experiences in a blended learning course. ReCALL, 23(03), 218–232. htps://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344011000152 19. Coryell, J. E., & Chlup, D. T. (2007). Implementing E-Learning components with adult English language learners: Vital factors and lessons learned. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(3), 263–278. htps://doi.org/10.1080/095882207014893332018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS... 205 20. Cotrell, D., & Robison, R. (2003). Blended Learning in an Accounting Course. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 261-269. 21. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., … F. J.-T. handbook of, & 2006, undefned. (n.d.). Blended learning enters the mainstream. Books.Google.Com. Retrieved from htps://www.google. com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=tKdyCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA195&dq=Dziuban+et+al.+ ,2006&ots=BhjJLxBAgl&sig=IOTsXJbhp3X_ARH7yKw5y6noRVI 22. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P. & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 195-208). San Francisco: Pfeiffer. 23. Dziuban, C.D., Hartman, J.L., Moskal, P.D, Sorg, S., & Truman, B. (2004). Three ALN modalities: an institutional perspective. In G. Bourne & J.C. Moore (Eds.), Elements of Quality Online Education. (pp. 127148). Sloan Consortium. 24. Francis, R., & Shannon, S. J. (2013). Engaging with blended learning to improve students’ learning outcomes. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(4), 359–369. htps://doi. org/10.1080/03043797.2013.766679 25. Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to Hybrid Courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Retrieved from htp://www.uwsa.edu/tt/articles/garnham.htm 26. Garrison, D. R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and higher education, 7(2), 95-105. 27. Garrison, D. R. & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 28. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. htps://doi. org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 29. Gecer, A. (2013). ERIC - Lecturer-Student Communication in Blended Learning Environments, Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 2013. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13, 362–367. Retrieved from htps://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1016744 30. Gerbic, P. (2011). Teaching using a blended approach–what does the literature tell us? Educational Media International, 48(3), 221-234. 31. Gonzalez, C. (2010). What do university teachers think eLearning is good for in their teaching? Studies in Higher Education, 35(1), 61-78. 32. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Defnition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. 33. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems: Defnition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing.206 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS... 34. Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2003). Blended Learning Environments: A Review of the Research Literature. Unpublished manuscript, Provo, UT. 35. Gray, J. A., and Diloreto, M., 2016. The Effects of Student Engagement, Student Satisfaction, and Perceived Learning in Online Learning Environments. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 11(1). 36. Hiep, P. H. (2005). University English classrooms in Vietnam. ELT journal, 59(4), 336-338. 37. Hieu, D. T. H. (2013). Changing pedagogies: Vietnamese case from international perspectives. Tap chi Khoa hoc DHSP TPHCM, 54, 136-145. 38. Hoa, N. T. M. (2009). An experimental application of the problem-posing approach for English language teaching in Vietnam. In T. Stewart (Ed.), In insights on teaching speaking in TESOL (pp. 203-219). Alexandria: TESOL Inc. 39. Hoang, N. B. & Thao, L. (2012). ICT in Vietnamese education: Development and challenges. In L. Thao & L. Quynh (Eds.), Technologies for enhancing pedagogy, engagement and empowerment in education: Creating learningfriendly environments (pp. 160-171). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 40. Hoang, N. T. (2015). EFL teachers’ perceptions and experiences of blended learning in a Vietnamese university. Ofce of Education Research; Faculty of Education. Retrieved from htp://eprints.qut.edu.au/83945/ 41. Hofstede, G. H., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Sofware of the mind : Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. New York: McGraw-Hill. 42. Hong, K. H., & Samimy, K. K. (2010). The Influence of L2 Teachers’ Use of CALL Modes on Language Learners’ Reactions to Blended Learning. CALICO Journal. Equinox Publishing Ltd. htps://doi.org/10.2307/calicojournal.27.2.328 43. Hunt, A.-M., 2015. Blended Online Learning in Initial Teacher Education: A Professional Inquiry into Pre-service Teachers’ Inquiry Projects. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 19(2), pp. 48–60. 44. Lameras, P., Levy, P., Paraskakis, I. & Webber, S. (2012). Blended university teaching using virtual learning environments: conceptions and approaches. Instructional Science, 40(1), 141-157. doi: 10.1007/s11251-011-9170-9 45. Lee, J., 2014. An Exploratory Study of Effective Online Learning: Assessing Satisfaction Levels of Graduate Students of Mathematics Education Associated with Human and Design Factors of an Online Course. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1). 46. López-Pérez, M. V., Pérez-López, M. C., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Argente-Linares, E. (2013). The influence of the use of technology on student outcomes in a blended learning context. Educational Technology Research and Development, 61(4), 625–638. htps:// doi.org/10.1007/s11423-013-9303-82018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS... 207 47. Marsh, D. (2012). Blended learning: Creating learning opportunities for language learners. New York: Cambridge University Press. 48. Martin, E. & Ramsden, P. (1998). Approaches to teaching creative writing. In B. Dart & G. Boulton-Lewis (Eds.), Teaching and learning in Higher Education (pp. 26-41). Melbourne: ACER. 49. Ndon, U. T. (2006). The lived experiences of university faculty who teach using a hybrid instructional model (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee. 50. Niemiec, M. & Ote, G. (2010). An administrator’s guide to the whys and hows of blended learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 14(1), 91-102. 51. Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A. K., & Hatesen Balle, S. (n.d.). A Literature Review of the Factors Influencing E-Learning and Blended Learning in Relation to Learning Outcome, Student Satisfaction and Engagement. The Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 16(1), 46–55. Retrieved from www.ejel.org 52. Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacifc region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589-589. 53. Ocak, M. A. (2011). Why are faculty members not teaching blended courses? Insights from faculty members. Computers & Education, 56(3), 689-699. doi: 10.1016/j. compedu.2010.10.011 54. Oh, E. & Park, S. (2009). How are universities involved in blended instruction? Educational Technology and Society, 12(3), 327-342. 55. Orton-Johnson, K. (2009). ‘I’ve stuck to the path I’m afraid’: exploring student non-use of blended learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(5), 837–847. htps://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00860.x 56. Otenbreit-Lefwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J. & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321-1335. 57. Peeraer, J. & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Factors influencing integration of ICT in higher education in Vietnam. Global Learn, 2010(1), 916-924. 58. Phuong-Mai, N., Terlouw, C., & Pilot, A. (2005). Cooperative learning vs Confucian heritage culture’s collectivism: confrontation to reveal some cultural conflicts and mismatch. Asia Europe Journal, 3(3), 403–419. htps://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-005-0008-4 59. Reima Sado Al-Jarf. (2005). The Effects of Online Grammar Instruction on Low Profciency EFL College Students’ Achievement. Retrieved from htp://www.asian-efl-journal.com 60. Schober, A., Schober, A., & Keller, L. (2012). International journal of emerging technologies in learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET) (Vol. 7). [Kassel Univ. Press?]. Retrieved from htps://www.learntechlib.org/p/44977/208 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS GRADUATE RESEARCH SYMPOSIUM PROCEEDINGS... 61. Scot, K. M. (2014). Change in university teachers’ elearning beliefs and practices: a longitudinal study. Studies in Higher Education(in press), 1-17. 62. STRACKE, E. (2007). A road to understanding: A qualitative study into why learners drop out of a blended language learning (BLL) environment. ReCALL, 19(01), 57. htps:// doi.org/10.1017/S0958344007000511 63. Taylor, J. A., & Newton, D. (2013). Beyond blended learning: A case study of institutional change at an Australian regional university. International Journal of Engineering Education, 18(54–60). 64. Thanh, P. T. H. & Renshaw, P. (2013). How to enable Asian teachers to empower students to adopt student-centred learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 38(11), 65-85. 65. Thu, D. X. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ use of ICT in language teaching: A case study of Hanoi University, Vietnam. Paper presented at the International Conference “ICT for Language Learning, 4th edition, Simonelli Editore, Florence, Italy. 66. Thu, D. X., Nicholas, H. & Lewis, R. (2012). Key barriers to ICT uptake in foreign language teaching in Vietnam: A case study. INTED2012, 4266-4274. 67. Tuty, J. I., & Klein, J. D. (2008). Computer-mediated instruction: a comparison of online and face-to-face collaboration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 56(2), 101–124. htps://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9050-9 68. Utsumi, L. & Hau, D. T. N. (2010). Trends in teaching and learning English in Vietnam: Implication for future. CHEER for Viet Nam - Traversing Borders: Viet Nam Teacher Program. Retrieved from education.vnu.edu.vn/eng/coe/conference2009/9.Anh. pdf website: 69. Vaughan, N. (2007). Perspectives on blended learning in higher education. International Journal on E-Learning, 6(1), 81–94. 978-604-62-6097-4 http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/67493 en application/pdf NHÀ XUẤT BẢN ĐẠI HỌC QUỐC GIA HÀ NỘI