The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education

The casebook method is the usage of casebooks containing court decisions of actual cases as teaching materials; and the Socratic method is the in-class dialogue or questioning employed by the teacher. They were first introduced in American legal education by Former Harvard Law professor Christopher...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Truong, Hai Ha
Other Authors: Nguyen, Thi Bach Thao
Format: Final Year Project
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/99917
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Vietnam National University, Hanoi
Language: English
id oai:112.137.131.14:VNU_123-99917
record_format dspace
spelling oai:112.137.131.14:VNU_123-999172020-12-24T08:05:07Z The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education Truong, Hai Ha Nguyen, Thi Bach Thao ĐHQGHN - Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ Tiếng Anh Pháp luật Hoa Kỳ The casebook method is the usage of casebooks containing court decisions of actual cases as teaching materials; and the Socratic method is the in-class dialogue or questioning employed by the teacher. They were first introduced in American legal education by Former Harvard Law professor Christopher Columbus Langdell in the 1870s. Although the heated debate as to the effectiveness of the methods have never ceased since then, the casebook and Socratic methods remain the predominant teaching methods in American till the current day. This thesis paper presents a brief history of how the two methods came into existence in the American legal education, analyzes the two methods in practice along with their supporting and opposing critiques, and offers some implications for Vietnamese higher education. From the information collected and processed by means of document comparative analysis methodology, it was found that despite all the critiques, the casebook and the Socratic methods have proved to be especially effective in preparing students for their future careers. Based on such analysis, some implications for Vietnamese higher education can be realized. First, it is necessary for Vietnamese higher education to prepare students with practical skills to meet the demands of the labor market. Secondly, teachers and learners’ interaction in Vietnamese higher education should be increased. Last but not least, Vietnamese learners’ self-study ability needs to be developed. These can be done by learning the appropriate teaching methods from more advanced countries. However, Vietnamese social, economic and other related features need to be taken into consideration before any adoption and/or adaption is made 2020-12-24T08:05:07Z 2020-12-24T08:05:07Z 2011 Final Year Project (FYP) http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/99917 en 85 p. application/pdf
institution Vietnam National University, Hanoi
building VNU Library & Information Center
continent Asia
country Vietnam
Vietnam
content_provider VNU Library and Information Center
collection VNU Digital Repository
language English
topic Tiếng Anh
Pháp luật Hoa Kỳ
spellingShingle Tiếng Anh
Pháp luật Hoa Kỳ
Truong, Hai Ha
The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education
description The casebook method is the usage of casebooks containing court decisions of actual cases as teaching materials; and the Socratic method is the in-class dialogue or questioning employed by the teacher. They were first introduced in American legal education by Former Harvard Law professor Christopher Columbus Langdell in the 1870s. Although the heated debate as to the effectiveness of the methods have never ceased since then, the casebook and Socratic methods remain the predominant teaching methods in American till the current day. This thesis paper presents a brief history of how the two methods came into existence in the American legal education, analyzes the two methods in practice along with their supporting and opposing critiques, and offers some implications for Vietnamese higher education. From the information collected and processed by means of document comparative analysis methodology, it was found that despite all the critiques, the casebook and the Socratic methods have proved to be especially effective in preparing students for their future careers. Based on such analysis, some implications for Vietnamese higher education can be realized. First, it is necessary for Vietnamese higher education to prepare students with practical skills to meet the demands of the labor market. Secondly, teachers and learners’ interaction in Vietnamese higher education should be increased. Last but not least, Vietnamese learners’ self-study ability needs to be developed. These can be done by learning the appropriate teaching methods from more advanced countries. However, Vietnamese social, economic and other related features need to be taken into consideration before any adoption and/or adaption is made
author2 Nguyen, Thi Bach Thao
author_facet Nguyen, Thi Bach Thao
Truong, Hai Ha
format Final Year Project
author Truong, Hai Ha
author_sort Truong, Hai Ha
title The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education
title_short The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education
title_full The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education
title_fullStr The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education
title_full_unstemmed The casebook and socratic methods in the United States legal education
title_sort casebook and socratic methods in the united states legal education
publishDate 2020
url http://repository.vnu.edu.vn/handle/VNU_123/99917
_version_ 1688758171263303680