Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis

The key to understanding any social phenomenon is to follow how actors tread the social landscape and describe how they form groups, fuse meanings, and create associations with different frames. In this paper, I employ Bruno Latour’s reconceptualization of assemblage to trace how NGOs and other acto...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lacbawan, Macario B.
Format: text
Published: Animo Repository 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol16/iss2/3
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1082/viewcontent/2.Research_20Article_Lacbawan_20120216.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-1082
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-10822024-06-03T01:06:03Z Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis Lacbawan, Macario B. The key to understanding any social phenomenon is to follow how actors tread the social landscape and describe how they form groups, fuse meanings, and create associations with different frames. In this paper, I employ Bruno Latour’s reconceptualization of assemblage to trace how NGOs and other actors create assemblages by fusing or defusing dog-eating with discourses on dirt, epidemic, and human rights. More specifically, NGOs such as LinisGobyerno and Animal Kingdom Foundation (AKF) produce assemblages that align dog-eating with sanitation, violence, and epidemic. Conversely, supporters of the practice try to invert these claims by foregrounding dog-meat consumption as an entitlement that is protected by both local and international legal codes. This paper also engages with previous attempts to analyze dog-eating and their failure to deal with the quotidian ways in which actors bundle the practice with multiple frames. Rather than presupposing how peoples’ discursive understanding of food as inflections of deep binary-oppositions, or an epiphenomenon of productive forces, I opine that we must refocus on how actors themselves interpret contentious food practices by following their action in a flattened social world. 2016-12-30T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol16/iss2/3 info:doi/10.59588/2350-8329.1082 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1082/viewcontent/2.Research_20Article_Lacbawan_20120216.pdf Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Animo Repository Assemblage Northern Philippines Dog-eating Food Bruno Latour Social Analysis
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
topic Assemblage
Northern Philippines
Dog-eating
Food
Bruno Latour
Social Analysis
spellingShingle Assemblage
Northern Philippines
Dog-eating
Food
Bruno Latour
Social Analysis
Lacbawan, Macario B.
Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
description The key to understanding any social phenomenon is to follow how actors tread the social landscape and describe how they form groups, fuse meanings, and create associations with different frames. In this paper, I employ Bruno Latour’s reconceptualization of assemblage to trace how NGOs and other actors create assemblages by fusing or defusing dog-eating with discourses on dirt, epidemic, and human rights. More specifically, NGOs such as LinisGobyerno and Animal Kingdom Foundation (AKF) produce assemblages that align dog-eating with sanitation, violence, and epidemic. Conversely, supporters of the practice try to invert these claims by foregrounding dog-meat consumption as an entitlement that is protected by both local and international legal codes. This paper also engages with previous attempts to analyze dog-eating and their failure to deal with the quotidian ways in which actors bundle the practice with multiple frames. Rather than presupposing how peoples’ discursive understanding of food as inflections of deep binary-oppositions, or an epiphenomenon of productive forces, I opine that we must refocus on how actors themselves interpret contentious food practices by following their action in a flattened social world.
format text
author Lacbawan, Macario B.
author_facet Lacbawan, Macario B.
author_sort Lacbawan, Macario B.
title Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
title_short Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
title_full Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
title_fullStr Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
title_sort assembling barbarity, dirt, and violence: a provisional note on food and social analysis
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2016
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol16/iss2/3
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1082/viewcontent/2.Research_20Article_Lacbawan_20120216.pdf
_version_ 1806510827865374720