Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis
The key to understanding any social phenomenon is to follow how actors tread the social landscape and describe how they form groups, fuse meanings, and create associations with different frames. In this paper, I employ Bruno Latour’s reconceptualization of assemblage to trace how NGOs and other acto...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol16/iss2/3 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1082/viewcontent/2.Research_20Article_Lacbawan_20120216.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
id |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-1082 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:apssr-10822024-06-03T01:06:03Z Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis Lacbawan, Macario B. The key to understanding any social phenomenon is to follow how actors tread the social landscape and describe how they form groups, fuse meanings, and create associations with different frames. In this paper, I employ Bruno Latour’s reconceptualization of assemblage to trace how NGOs and other actors create assemblages by fusing or defusing dog-eating with discourses on dirt, epidemic, and human rights. More specifically, NGOs such as LinisGobyerno and Animal Kingdom Foundation (AKF) produce assemblages that align dog-eating with sanitation, violence, and epidemic. Conversely, supporters of the practice try to invert these claims by foregrounding dog-meat consumption as an entitlement that is protected by both local and international legal codes. This paper also engages with previous attempts to analyze dog-eating and their failure to deal with the quotidian ways in which actors bundle the practice with multiple frames. Rather than presupposing how peoples’ discursive understanding of food as inflections of deep binary-oppositions, or an epiphenomenon of productive forces, I opine that we must refocus on how actors themselves interpret contentious food practices by following their action in a flattened social world. 2016-12-30T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol16/iss2/3 info:doi/10.59588/2350-8329.1082 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1082/viewcontent/2.Research_20Article_Lacbawan_20120216.pdf Asia-Pacific Social Science Review Animo Repository Assemblage Northern Philippines Dog-eating Food Bruno Latour Social Analysis |
institution |
De La Salle University |
building |
De La Salle University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
De La Salle University Library |
collection |
DLSU Institutional Repository |
topic |
Assemblage Northern Philippines Dog-eating Food Bruno Latour Social Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Assemblage Northern Philippines Dog-eating Food Bruno Latour Social Analysis Lacbawan, Macario B. Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence: A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis |
description |
The key to understanding any social phenomenon is to follow how actors tread the social landscape and describe how they form groups, fuse meanings, and create associations with different frames. In this paper, I employ Bruno Latour’s reconceptualization of assemblage to trace how NGOs and other actors create assemblages by fusing or defusing dog-eating with discourses on dirt, epidemic, and human rights. More specifically, NGOs such as LinisGobyerno and Animal Kingdom Foundation (AKF) produce assemblages that align dog-eating with sanitation, violence, and epidemic. Conversely, supporters of the practice try to invert these claims by foregrounding dog-meat consumption as an entitlement that is protected by both local and international legal codes. This paper also engages with previous attempts to analyze dog-eating and their failure to deal with the quotidian ways in which actors bundle the practice with multiple frames. Rather than presupposing how peoples’ discursive understanding of food as inflections of deep binary-oppositions, or an epiphenomenon of productive forces, I opine that we must refocus on how actors themselves interpret contentious food practices by following their action in a flattened social world. |
format |
text |
author |
Lacbawan, Macario B. |
author_facet |
Lacbawan, Macario B. |
author_sort |
Lacbawan, Macario B. |
title |
Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence:
A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis |
title_short |
Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence:
A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis |
title_full |
Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence:
A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis |
title_fullStr |
Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence:
A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assembling Barbarity, Dirt, and Violence:
A Provisional Note on Food and Social Analysis |
title_sort |
assembling barbarity, dirt, and violence:
a provisional note on food and social analysis |
publisher |
Animo Repository |
publishDate |
2016 |
url |
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/apssr/vol16/iss2/3 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/apssr/article/1082/viewcontent/2.Research_20Article_Lacbawan_20120216.pdf |
_version_ |
1806510827865374720 |