Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?

In this work, the author argues for the claim that modal conditions, particularly sensitivity and safety, are not necessary for knowledge. He does this by first investigating problem cases for both modal conditions, noting that they point to an internal glitch that even a revised similarity ranking...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dacela, Mark Anthony L.
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/367
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-1366
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_doctoral-13662021-05-18T01:33:14Z Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge? Dacela, Mark Anthony L. In this work, the author argues for the claim that modal conditions, particularly sensitivity and safety, are not necessary for knowledge. He does this by first investigating problem cases for both modal conditions, noting that they point to an internal glitch that even a revised similarity ranking or ordering of worlds, which others proposed, cannot fix. He then demonstrates, by way of a set theoretical profiling of the problem cases and a set theoretical analysis of the modal semantics at work in both sensitivity and safety, that these modal conditions fail whenever necessary links that are constitutive of epistemic circumstances actually obtain but are not modally preserved And since there are instances when knowledge only requires this, he concludes that modal conditions are not necessary for knowledge. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z text https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/367 Dissertations English Animo Repository Knowledge Theory of
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Knowledge
Theory of
spellingShingle Knowledge
Theory of
Dacela, Mark Anthony L.
Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
description In this work, the author argues for the claim that modal conditions, particularly sensitivity and safety, are not necessary for knowledge. He does this by first investigating problem cases for both modal conditions, noting that they point to an internal glitch that even a revised similarity ranking or ordering of worlds, which others proposed, cannot fix. He then demonstrates, by way of a set theoretical profiling of the problem cases and a set theoretical analysis of the modal semantics at work in both sensitivity and safety, that these modal conditions fail whenever necessary links that are constitutive of epistemic circumstances actually obtain but are not modally preserved And since there are instances when knowledge only requires this, he concludes that modal conditions are not necessary for knowledge.
format text
author Dacela, Mark Anthony L.
author_facet Dacela, Mark Anthony L.
author_sort Dacela, Mark Anthony L.
title Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
title_short Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
title_full Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
title_fullStr Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
title_full_unstemmed Are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
title_sort are modal conditions necessary for knowledge?
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2013
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/367
_version_ 1772836007263076352