A critique of Alvin Platinga's religious epistemology
Alvin Plantinga defends the rationality of belief in God in his Religious Epistemology. He argues against evidentialism that belief in God does not need propositional evidence, like the arguments from natural theology, to be rational because it is a properly basic belief. It is similar to belief in...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Maraya, Erlito A. |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_doctoral/572 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
Language: | English |
Similar Items
-
Laporan penelitian struktur epistemologi Islam
by: Amien, Miska M.
Published: (1989) -
A Critique of Cultural Theory's Impossibility Theorem
by: NOWACKI, Mark
Published: (2004) -
On epistemological traditions, truths and proverbial frogs
by: Montemar, Louie C.
Published: (2006) -
The merging of presuppositionalism and evidentialism towards a new route in defense of the Christian faith: An epistemological hermeneutics
by: Carag, Anacleto S.
Published: (2001) -
A philosophical reflection of the religious experience
by: Aguilar, George Lacson, Jr.
Published: (1989)