Improving teachers preparation through training and development
This Integrated Action Research (IAR) focused on the issue of lack of training in preparation for the subjects handled by the Knowledge Group 2 of Kingfisher School of Business and Finance. To collect and validate data, I used the concept of data triangulation and the Ladder of Inference. Through th...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Animo Repository
2016
|
Online Access: | https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/5255 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | De La Salle University |
Language: | English |
Summary: | This Integrated Action Research (IAR) focused on the issue of lack of training in preparation for the subjects handled by the Knowledge Group 2 of Kingfisher School of Business and Finance. To collect and validate data, I used the concept of data triangulation and the Ladder of Inference. Through these tools, we were able to conclude that this issue was further manifested by the delays in delivery of subject matter and submission of reports, low satisfactory ratings of the teacher by the students, and teachers lack of confidence in teaching the subject. We have identified that the primary aims of this study are to train teachers in terms of planning and preparing for the delivery of instruction and to develop a culture of efficient and effective delivery of subject matter among teachers, enhancing our competency as classroom teachers. Guided by Kirkpatricks training framework, I implemented the two cycles of this study through the collaboration of my teammates, our students, and the academic dean. I have also utilized Coghlan and Brannicks action research model to implement cycle 1 which involved planning sessions and training scheme to address the lack of preparation and cycle 2 which involved classroom implementation of the plans. Kurt Lewins Change Management Framework also helped us embrace change as we provide solutions to the issue. After the cycles, there were deemed improvement in our performance as evident in our prompt submission of reports, on-track delivery of subject matter, increased satisfactory ratings from the students, and increased confidence in handling classroom discussion. This action research made us more effective and efficient in classroom teaching. Through this, we became well-equipped and prepared in classroom discussion making us realized that training in preparation is vital part of teaching and learning process. |
---|