Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section

In this action research, we intended to address the inequitable workload delegation process in the Head Office Services Section (HOSS) of Systems and Methods Department. We needed to improve the workload management to make sure that work is delivered within the specified service level agreement with...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dela Cruz, Rea Cassandra Baena
Format: text
Language:English
Published: Animo Repository 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6041
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13113/viewcontent/Dela_Cruz_Rea_Cassandra_11695897_Redacted.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: De La Salle University
Language: English
id oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-13113
record_format eprints
spelling oai:animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph:etd_masteral-131132022-05-25T03:43:55Z Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section Dela Cruz, Rea Cassandra Baena In this action research, we intended to address the inequitable workload delegation process in the Head Office Services Section (HOSS) of Systems and Methods Department. We needed to improve the workload management to make sure that work is delivered within the specified service level agreement with 123 Bank’s units and keeping a balance in delegating the amount of work aligned with our current capacities. Guided by the Accountee and Accountor Interaction Model embedded in the Role Theory and Gap Analysis, our section came up with a project timeline and improvement metric we called Project List V2.0 and HOSS Project Dashboard to gauge if we have created an improvement in our workload delegation process. This is to correctly identify the main source of the problem and challenge the organization to continually improve the quality of their service and to keep up their competitiveness in accordance with their business needs. We also applied the ADKAR model to implement change in our section. As an insider action researcher, building awareness of the change is defining what the change is and who will implement it. Our section’s desire was fully embraced by the whole team – who will be affected by the change, we have set goals based on our current state and formulated metrics to achieve our future state. To complete the 1st cycle of this action research, we have clarified roles and workload distribution and for the 2nd cycle we revised the Systems and Methods Engagement Form (SEF) and implemented the HOSS Project Dashboard to reinforce the improvement we made on the workload delegation process. 2020-08-29T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6041 https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13113/viewcontent/Dela_Cruz_Rea_Cassandra_11695897_Redacted.pdf Master's Theses English Animo Repository Employees—Workload Human Resources Management Performance Management
institution De La Salle University
building De La Salle University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider De La Salle University Library
collection DLSU Institutional Repository
language English
topic Employees—Workload
Human Resources Management
Performance Management
spellingShingle Employees—Workload
Human Resources Management
Performance Management
Dela Cruz, Rea Cassandra Baena
Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
description In this action research, we intended to address the inequitable workload delegation process in the Head Office Services Section (HOSS) of Systems and Methods Department. We needed to improve the workload management to make sure that work is delivered within the specified service level agreement with 123 Bank’s units and keeping a balance in delegating the amount of work aligned with our current capacities. Guided by the Accountee and Accountor Interaction Model embedded in the Role Theory and Gap Analysis, our section came up with a project timeline and improvement metric we called Project List V2.0 and HOSS Project Dashboard to gauge if we have created an improvement in our workload delegation process. This is to correctly identify the main source of the problem and challenge the organization to continually improve the quality of their service and to keep up their competitiveness in accordance with their business needs. We also applied the ADKAR model to implement change in our section. As an insider action researcher, building awareness of the change is defining what the change is and who will implement it. Our section’s desire was fully embraced by the whole team – who will be affected by the change, we have set goals based on our current state and formulated metrics to achieve our future state. To complete the 1st cycle of this action research, we have clarified roles and workload distribution and for the 2nd cycle we revised the Systems and Methods Engagement Form (SEF) and implemented the HOSS Project Dashboard to reinforce the improvement we made on the workload delegation process.
format text
author Dela Cruz, Rea Cassandra Baena
author_facet Dela Cruz, Rea Cassandra Baena
author_sort Dela Cruz, Rea Cassandra Baena
title Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
title_short Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
title_full Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
title_fullStr Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
title_full_unstemmed Addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
title_sort addressing inequitable workload delegation of head office service section
publisher Animo Repository
publishDate 2020
url https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/etd_masteral/6041
https://animorepository.dlsu.edu.ph/context/etd_masteral/article/13113/viewcontent/Dela_Cruz_Rea_Cassandra_11695897_Redacted.pdf
_version_ 1772835954404360192