How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?

As a precondition of philosophical dialogue among different cultures, this essay forwards a series of questions regarding the epistemological presuppositions of the current dominant knowledge culture, which is characterized by a capitalistic, technological, and colonial ethos. By stating its presupp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/budhi/vol17/iss1/2
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/budhi/article/1066/viewcontent/Budhi_2017.1_202_20Article_20__20Betancourt.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.budhi-1066
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.budhi-10662024-11-22T12:29:39Z How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know? Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl As a precondition of philosophical dialogue among different cultures, this essay forwards a series of questions regarding the epistemological presuppositions of the current dominant knowledge culture, which is characterized by a capitalistic, technological, and colonial ethos. By stating its presuppositions, situating these in the historical context of its development, and drawing their consequences, the essay opens up the possibility of overcoming this dominant ethos of knowledge through the recuperation of epistemological plurality by way of exchanges among a multiplicity of knowledge cultures. The essay proposes that it is philosophy’s task today to resist the dehumanization of knowledge by asking what we should know, how, with whom, and for what purpose we want to know what we should know. 2024-11-24T11:34:59Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/budhi/vol17/iss1/2 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/budhi/article/1066/viewcontent/Budhi_2017.1_202_20Article_20__20Betancourt.pdf Budhi: A Journal of Ideas and Culture Archīum Ateneo epistemological plurality epistemological violence knowledge cultures knowledge consent
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic epistemological plurality
epistemological violence
knowledge cultures
knowledge
consent
spellingShingle epistemological plurality
epistemological violence
knowledge cultures
knowledge
consent
Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl
How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?
description As a precondition of philosophical dialogue among different cultures, this essay forwards a series of questions regarding the epistemological presuppositions of the current dominant knowledge culture, which is characterized by a capitalistic, technological, and colonial ethos. By stating its presuppositions, situating these in the historical context of its development, and drawing their consequences, the essay opens up the possibility of overcoming this dominant ethos of knowledge through the recuperation of epistemological plurality by way of exchanges among a multiplicity of knowledge cultures. The essay proposes that it is philosophy’s task today to resist the dehumanization of knowledge by asking what we should know, how, with whom, and for what purpose we want to know what we should know.
format text
author Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl
author_facet Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl
author_sort Fornet-Betancourt, Raúl
title How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?
title_short How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?
title_full How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?
title_fullStr How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?
title_full_unstemmed How are We to Think About the Knowledge that We Should Know?
title_sort how are we to think about the knowledge that we should know?
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2024
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/budhi/vol17/iss1/2
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/budhi/article/1066/viewcontent/Budhi_2017.1_202_20Article_20__20Betancourt.pdf
_version_ 1816861520350412800