Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis

Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis was used to evaluate the binding performance of molecularly imprinted microspheres (MIM) toward its template histamine and analogs at pH 7, and compared to the high performance liquid chromatographic method. In both methods, batch binding was employed and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Romano, Edwin F, Jr., Quirino, Joselito P, Holdsworth, John L, So, Regina C, Holdsworth, Clovia I
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/180
https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.201600448
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-1175
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.chemistry-faculty-pubs-11752022-03-31T01:09:02Z Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis Romano, Edwin F, Jr. Quirino, Joselito P Holdsworth, John L So, Regina C Holdsworth, Clovia I Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis was used to evaluate the binding performance of molecularly imprinted microspheres (MIM) toward its template histamine and analogs at pH 7, and compared to the high performance liquid chromatographic method. In both methods, batch binding was employed and the binding parameters were calculated from the measured concentration of unbound amine analytes and afforded comparable histamine equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd ∼ 0.4 mM). FACE was easily carried out at shorter binding equilibration time (i.e. 30 min) and without the need to separate the microspheres, circumventing laborious and, in the case of the system under study, inefficient sample filtration. It also allowed for competitive binding studies by virtue of its ability to distinctly separate intact microspheres and all tested amines which could not be resolved in HPLC. Kd’s for nonimprinted (control) microspheres (NIM) from FACE and HPLC were also comparable (∼ 0.6 mM) but at higher histamine concentrations, HPLC gave lower histamine binding. This discrepancy was attributed to inefficient filtration of the batch binding samples prior to HPLC analysis resulting in an over-estimation of the concentration of free histamine brought about by the presence of unfiltered histamine-bound microspheres. 2017-03-03T08:00:00Z text https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/180 https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.201600448 Chemistry Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo Capillary electrophoresis Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis Histamine Histamine-imprinted microspheres Molecularly imprinted polymers Chemistry
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Capillary electrophoresis
Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis
Histamine
Histamine-imprinted microspheres
Molecularly imprinted polymers
Chemistry
spellingShingle Capillary electrophoresis
Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis
Histamine
Histamine-imprinted microspheres
Molecularly imprinted polymers
Chemistry
Romano, Edwin F, Jr.
Quirino, Joselito P
Holdsworth, John L
So, Regina C
Holdsworth, Clovia I
Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis
description Frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis was used to evaluate the binding performance of molecularly imprinted microspheres (MIM) toward its template histamine and analogs at pH 7, and compared to the high performance liquid chromatographic method. In both methods, batch binding was employed and the binding parameters were calculated from the measured concentration of unbound amine analytes and afforded comparable histamine equilibrium dissociation constants (Kd ∼ 0.4 mM). FACE was easily carried out at shorter binding equilibration time (i.e. 30 min) and without the need to separate the microspheres, circumventing laborious and, in the case of the system under study, inefficient sample filtration. It also allowed for competitive binding studies by virtue of its ability to distinctly separate intact microspheres and all tested amines which could not be resolved in HPLC. Kd’s for nonimprinted (control) microspheres (NIM) from FACE and HPLC were also comparable (∼ 0.6 mM) but at higher histamine concentrations, HPLC gave lower histamine binding. This discrepancy was attributed to inefficient filtration of the batch binding samples prior to HPLC analysis resulting in an over-estimation of the concentration of free histamine brought about by the presence of unfiltered histamine-bound microspheres.
format text
author Romano, Edwin F, Jr.
Quirino, Joselito P
Holdsworth, John L
So, Regina C
Holdsworth, Clovia I
author_facet Romano, Edwin F, Jr.
Quirino, Joselito P
Holdsworth, John L
So, Regina C
Holdsworth, Clovia I
author_sort Romano, Edwin F, Jr.
title Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis
title_short Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis
title_full Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis
title_fullStr Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Binding Performance of Histamine-Imprinted Microspheres by Frontal Analysis Capillary Electrophoresis
title_sort assessment of the binding performance of histamine-imprinted microspheres by frontal analysis capillary electrophoresis
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2017
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/chemistry-faculty-pubs/180
https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/elps.201600448
_version_ 1729800114902401024