Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models

Purpose This paper aims to present the concepts of two different ways of generating a dynamic structure of the urban system to further allow in understanding specific urban behavior facing against flood and further evaluate the potential effect of specific resilience strategies aiming to decrease th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Feofilovs, Maksims, Romagnoli, Francesco, Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z, Josol, Jairus Carmela C, Jardeleza, Jean Meir, Litam, Joseph Emauel, Campos, Joaquin Ignacio, Abenojar, Katrina
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs/49
https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=es-faculty-pubs
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.es-faculty-pubs-1048
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.es-faculty-pubs-10482020-06-29T05:48:59Z Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models Feofilovs, Maksims Romagnoli, Francesco Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z Josol, Jairus Carmela C Jardeleza, Jean Meir Litam, Joseph Emauel Campos, Joaquin Ignacio Abenojar, Katrina Purpose This paper aims to present the concepts of two different ways of generating a dynamic structure of the urban system to further allow in understanding specific urban behavior facing against flood and further evaluate the potential effect of specific resilience strategies aiming to decrease the exposure and vulnerability of the system. Design/methodology/approach Two system dynamics model structures are presented in form of Casual Loop Diagrams. Findings The main differences among the tow approaches are the time horizon and the approach that regulates the assessment of the resilience through a dynamic composite indicator: the first model refers to baseline at initial simulation time; the second model is focused on the ratio service supply to demand. Research limitations/implications Within the approach, the purpose is to properly and efficiently evaluate the effect of different Flood Risk Management strategies, i.e. prevention, defence, mitigation, preparation and recovery for consistent and resilient flood governance plans with different type of resilience scenarios. Originality/value The need for such tool is underlined by a lack on the assessment of urban resilience to flood as whole, considering the physical and social dimensions and the complex interaction among their main components. There are several assessment tools based on an indicator approach that have been proposed to meet this need. Nevertheless, indicator-based approach has the limitation to exclude the complexity of the system and its systemic interaction in terms of feedbacks’ effects among the identified components or variables selected for the system description. This peculiarity can be provided by System Dynamics modeling. 2020-04-16T07:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs/49 https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=es-faculty-pubs Environmental Science Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo System dynamics Knowledge sharing Modelling Natural disasters Urban resilience Flooding Environmental Sciences Sustainability
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
country Philippines
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic System dynamics
Knowledge sharing
Modelling
Natural disasters
Urban resilience
Flooding
Environmental Sciences
Sustainability
spellingShingle System dynamics
Knowledge sharing
Modelling
Natural disasters
Urban resilience
Flooding
Environmental Sciences
Sustainability
Feofilovs, Maksims
Romagnoli, Francesco
Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
Josol, Jairus Carmela C
Jardeleza, Jean Meir
Litam, Joseph Emauel
Campos, Joaquin Ignacio
Abenojar, Katrina
Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
description Purpose This paper aims to present the concepts of two different ways of generating a dynamic structure of the urban system to further allow in understanding specific urban behavior facing against flood and further evaluate the potential effect of specific resilience strategies aiming to decrease the exposure and vulnerability of the system. Design/methodology/approach Two system dynamics model structures are presented in form of Casual Loop Diagrams. Findings The main differences among the tow approaches are the time horizon and the approach that regulates the assessment of the resilience through a dynamic composite indicator: the first model refers to baseline at initial simulation time; the second model is focused on the ratio service supply to demand. Research limitations/implications Within the approach, the purpose is to properly and efficiently evaluate the effect of different Flood Risk Management strategies, i.e. prevention, defence, mitigation, preparation and recovery for consistent and resilient flood governance plans with different type of resilience scenarios. Originality/value The need for such tool is underlined by a lack on the assessment of urban resilience to flood as whole, considering the physical and social dimensions and the complex interaction among their main components. There are several assessment tools based on an indicator approach that have been proposed to meet this need. Nevertheless, indicator-based approach has the limitation to exclude the complexity of the system and its systemic interaction in terms of feedbacks’ effects among the identified components or variables selected for the system description. This peculiarity can be provided by System Dynamics modeling.
format text
author Feofilovs, Maksims
Romagnoli, Francesco
Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
Josol, Jairus Carmela C
Jardeleza, Jean Meir
Litam, Joseph Emauel
Campos, Joaquin Ignacio
Abenojar, Katrina
author_facet Feofilovs, Maksims
Romagnoli, Francesco
Gotangco, Charlotte Kendra Z
Josol, Jairus Carmela C
Jardeleza, Jean Meir
Litam, Joseph Emauel
Campos, Joaquin Ignacio
Abenojar, Katrina
author_sort Feofilovs, Maksims
title Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
title_short Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
title_full Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
title_fullStr Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
title_full_unstemmed Assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
title_sort assessing resilience against floods with a system dynamics approach: a comparative study of two models
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2020
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/es-faculty-pubs/49
https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1048&context=es-faculty-pubs
_version_ 1681506691983605760