Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography
The COVID-19 pandemic brought about physical school closures and quick transitions online, with universities making decisions for this new mode of instruction. Such decisions, however, were open to discussion and debates, particularly as students and instructors held varying concerns, experiences, a...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | text |
Published: |
Archīum Ateneo
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://archium.ateneo.edu/is-faculty-pubs/33 https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=is-faculty-pubs |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Ateneo De Manila University |
id |
ph-ateneo-arc.is-faculty-pubs-1039 |
---|---|
record_format |
eprints |
spelling |
ph-ateneo-arc.is-faculty-pubs-10392022-01-24T07:59:06Z Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography Trinidad, Jose Eos R Ackary, Samantha Joan Pacleb, Lyka Janelle P Tabanao, Sophia Sue Dagohoy, Jan Llenzl The COVID-19 pandemic brought about physical school closures and quick transitions online, with universities making decisions for this new mode of instruction. Such decisions, however, were open to discussion and debates, particularly as students and instructors held varying concerns, experiences, and expectations for remote learning. We investigate what these debates are using a cyberethnography of a Facebook group for students and faculty, and an anonymous Freedom Wall page for students in the same university. The concerns centered on workload that balanced academic rigor and practical exigencies; learning modalities that balanced accountability and flexibility; and assessments that balanced academic integrity and viable accommodations. Taken altogether, these suggest that faculty and students’ concerns are not merely about discrete curricular choices but are, at their root, about balancing pedagogical excellence and practical adaptability. We thus suggest that universities couch their policies not through discrete options but through the balancing of values. 2021-01-01T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/is-faculty-pubs/33 https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=is-faculty-pubs Interdisciplinary Studies Faculty Publications Archīum Ateneo COVID-19 pedagogy higher education cyberethnography remote learning Educational Sociology Education Policy Higher Education |
institution |
Ateneo De Manila University |
building |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Philippines Philippines |
content_provider |
Ateneo De Manila University Library |
collection |
archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository |
topic |
COVID-19 pedagogy higher education cyberethnography remote learning Educational Sociology Education Policy Higher Education |
spellingShingle |
COVID-19 pedagogy higher education cyberethnography remote learning Educational Sociology Education Policy Higher Education Trinidad, Jose Eos R Ackary, Samantha Joan Pacleb, Lyka Janelle P Tabanao, Sophia Sue Dagohoy, Jan Llenzl Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography |
description |
The COVID-19 pandemic brought about physical school closures and quick transitions online, with universities making decisions for this new mode of instruction. Such decisions, however, were open to discussion and debates, particularly as students and instructors held varying concerns, experiences, and expectations for remote learning. We investigate what these debates are using a cyberethnography of a Facebook group for students and faculty, and an anonymous Freedom Wall page for students in the same university. The concerns centered on workload that balanced academic rigor and practical exigencies; learning modalities that balanced accountability and flexibility; and assessments that balanced academic integrity and viable accommodations. Taken altogether, these suggest that faculty and students’ concerns are not merely about discrete curricular choices but are, at their root, about balancing pedagogical excellence and practical adaptability. We thus suggest that universities couch their policies not through discrete options but through the balancing of values. |
format |
text |
author |
Trinidad, Jose Eos R Ackary, Samantha Joan Pacleb, Lyka Janelle P Tabanao, Sophia Sue Dagohoy, Jan Llenzl |
author_facet |
Trinidad, Jose Eos R Ackary, Samantha Joan Pacleb, Lyka Janelle P Tabanao, Sophia Sue Dagohoy, Jan Llenzl |
author_sort |
Trinidad, Jose Eos R |
title |
Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography |
title_short |
Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography |
title_full |
Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography |
title_fullStr |
Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography |
title_full_unstemmed |
Balancing the Pedagogical and Practical Concerns in Remote Higher Education: A Cyberethnography |
title_sort |
balancing the pedagogical and practical concerns in remote higher education: a cyberethnography |
publisher |
Archīum Ateneo |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://archium.ateneo.edu/is-faculty-pubs/33 https://archium.ateneo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=is-faculty-pubs |
_version_ |
1724079133742333952 |