The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique

Abundant debates on the problematic positioning of intellectuals in the Global South are typically confined to migrant scholars and to the insider/outsider binary vis-à-vis their object/subject of study. Yet intellectuals back home—both those returning and those who never left—must also forge throu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saloma, Czarina
Format: text
Published: Archīum Ateneo 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://archium.ateneo.edu/socialtransformations/vol8/iss2/4
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/socialtransformations/article/1146/viewcontent/ST_208.2_204_20Article_20__20Saloma.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Ateneo De Manila University
id ph-ateneo-arc.socialtransformations-1146
record_format eprints
spelling ph-ateneo-arc.socialtransformations-11462024-11-06T16:18:03Z The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique Saloma, Czarina Abundant debates on the problematic positioning of intellectuals in the Global South are typically confined to migrant scholars and to the insider/outsider binary vis-à-vis their object/subject of study. Yet intellectuals back home—both those returning and those who never left—must also forge through the fraught politics of location and epistemic privilege as the other side of the same coin. Nowhere is the politics of location perhaps more striking than in the social sciences and among social scientists based in the Global South who have mostly been trained in Western universities or in Westernized local universities. As academics who mobilize knowledge in the context of state-led and international donor-assisted development projects, their work demonstrates that in the Global South the primary goal of social scientists should be to not only offer a critique but to solve a problem toward making institutions and systems fulfill their functions. In this problem-solving mode, the distinctions between “outsider” as critical-distant (i.e., opening everything up for discussion and debate following a scholarly tradition but may be oblivious of contexts and particularities) and “insider” (i.e., possessing knowledge of the local manifestations of universalized and globalized processes but may not be critical-distant) are to be erased. The “outsider” joins forces with the “insider” as the social scientist moves from being critical-distant to being socially embedded and then back again. This problem-solving mode urges social scientists back home to be critical of but yet part of the system as one tries to solve a problem. 2020-11-30T08:00:00Z text application/pdf https://archium.ateneo.edu/socialtransformations/vol8/iss2/4 https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/socialtransformations/article/1146/viewcontent/ST_208.2_204_20Article_20__20Saloma.pdf Social Transformations Journal of the Global South Archīum Ateneo Filipino social scientists knowledge mobilization problem-solving mode World Bank
institution Ateneo De Manila University
building Ateneo De Manila University Library
continent Asia
country Philippines
Philippines
content_provider Ateneo De Manila University Library
collection archium.Ateneo Institutional Repository
topic Filipino social scientists
knowledge mobilization
problem-solving mode
World Bank
spellingShingle Filipino social scientists
knowledge mobilization
problem-solving mode
World Bank
Saloma, Czarina
The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique
description Abundant debates on the problematic positioning of intellectuals in the Global South are typically confined to migrant scholars and to the insider/outsider binary vis-à-vis their object/subject of study. Yet intellectuals back home—both those returning and those who never left—must also forge through the fraught politics of location and epistemic privilege as the other side of the same coin. Nowhere is the politics of location perhaps more striking than in the social sciences and among social scientists based in the Global South who have mostly been trained in Western universities or in Westernized local universities. As academics who mobilize knowledge in the context of state-led and international donor-assisted development projects, their work demonstrates that in the Global South the primary goal of social scientists should be to not only offer a critique but to solve a problem toward making institutions and systems fulfill their functions. In this problem-solving mode, the distinctions between “outsider” as critical-distant (i.e., opening everything up for discussion and debate following a scholarly tradition but may be oblivious of contexts and particularities) and “insider” (i.e., possessing knowledge of the local manifestations of universalized and globalized processes but may not be critical-distant) are to be erased. The “outsider” joins forces with the “insider” as the social scientist moves from being critical-distant to being socially embedded and then back again. This problem-solving mode urges social scientists back home to be critical of but yet part of the system as one tries to solve a problem.
format text
author Saloma, Czarina
author_facet Saloma, Czarina
author_sort Saloma, Czarina
title The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique
title_short The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique
title_full The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique
title_fullStr The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique
title_full_unstemmed The Problem-Solving Mode: Social Scientists Back Home and the Limits of Critique
title_sort problem-solving mode: social scientists back home and the limits of critique
publisher Archīum Ateneo
publishDate 2020
url https://archium.ateneo.edu/socialtransformations/vol8/iss2/4
https://archium.ateneo.edu/context/socialtransformations/article/1146/viewcontent/ST_208.2_204_20Article_20__20Saloma.pdf
_version_ 1816861421896466432