Should we retire the catalog?

As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog super...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cmor, Dianne, Litwan, Rory
Other Authors: Library
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/24228
http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-102293
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1022932020-09-21T20:10:42Z Should we retire the catalog? Cmor, Dianne Litwan, Rory Library DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog superfluous? In this installment of “Taking Issues,” Dianne Cmor argues that investing in two search tools is an unwise use of limited resources. Rory Litwin counters that the direct control traditional OPACs offer is a necessity for librarians and other advanced researchers. Accepted version 2014-11-15T16:01:43Z 2019-12-06T20:52:50Z 2014-11-15T16:01:43Z 2019-12-06T20:52:50Z 2014 2014 Journal Article Cmor, D. & Litwan, R. (2014). Should we retire the catalog? Reference & user services quarterly, 53(3), 213-216. 1094-9054 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/24228 10.5860/rusq.53n3.213 http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650 en Reference & user services quarterly © 2014 American Library Association. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Reference & User Services Quarterly, American Library Association. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650]. 4 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis
spellingShingle DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis
Cmor, Dianne
Litwan, Rory
Should we retire the catalog?
description As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog superfluous? In this installment of “Taking Issues,” Dianne Cmor argues that investing in two search tools is an unwise use of limited resources. Rory Litwin counters that the direct control traditional OPACs offer is a necessity for librarians and other advanced researchers.
author2 Library
author_facet Library
Cmor, Dianne
Litwan, Rory
format Article
author Cmor, Dianne
Litwan, Rory
author_sort Cmor, Dianne
title Should we retire the catalog?
title_short Should we retire the catalog?
title_full Should we retire the catalog?
title_fullStr Should we retire the catalog?
title_full_unstemmed Should we retire the catalog?
title_sort should we retire the catalog?
publishDate 2014
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/24228
http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650
_version_ 1681057377479032832