Should we retire the catalog?
As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog super...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/24228 http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-102293 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1022932020-09-21T20:10:42Z Should we retire the catalog? Cmor, Dianne Litwan, Rory Library DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog superfluous? In this installment of “Taking Issues,” Dianne Cmor argues that investing in two search tools is an unwise use of limited resources. Rory Litwin counters that the direct control traditional OPACs offer is a necessity for librarians and other advanced researchers. Accepted version 2014-11-15T16:01:43Z 2019-12-06T20:52:50Z 2014-11-15T16:01:43Z 2019-12-06T20:52:50Z 2014 2014 Journal Article Cmor, D. & Litwan, R. (2014). Should we retire the catalog? Reference & user services quarterly, 53(3), 213-216. 1094-9054 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/24228 10.5860/rusq.53n3.213 http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650 en Reference & user services quarterly © 2014 American Library Association. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by Reference & User Services Quarterly, American Library Association. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650]. 4 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
country |
Singapore |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Library and information science::Libraries::Information retrieval and analysis Cmor, Dianne Litwan, Rory Should we retire the catalog? |
description |
As more libraries adopt web-scale discovery services, many now find themselves offering two options for searching their holdings: the new discovery tool and the traditional OPAC. Are both necessary? Or does a discovery system by itself provide an adequate search environment, making the catalog superfluous? In this installment of “Taking Issues,” Dianne Cmor argues that investing in two search tools is an unwise use of limited resources. Rory Litwin counters that the direct control traditional OPACs offer is a necessity for librarians and other advanced researchers. |
author2 |
Library |
author_facet |
Library Cmor, Dianne Litwan, Rory |
format |
Article |
author |
Cmor, Dianne Litwan, Rory |
author_sort |
Cmor, Dianne |
title |
Should we retire the catalog? |
title_short |
Should we retire the catalog? |
title_full |
Should we retire the catalog? |
title_fullStr |
Should we retire the catalog? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Should we retire the catalog? |
title_sort |
should we retire the catalog? |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/102293 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/24228 http://rusa.metapress.com/content/x6408g8288175650 |
_version_ |
1681057377479032832 |