When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments

Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors’ reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability co-occur i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tan, Hun-Tong, Ying Wang, Elaine, Zhou, Bo
Other Authors: Nanyang Business School
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2014
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104586
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20245
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-104586
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1045862023-05-19T06:44:40Z When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments Tan, Hun-Tong Ying Wang, Elaine Zhou, Bo Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Finance::Investments Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors’ reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability co-occur in practice, their joint effects remain largely unexplored. In an experiment with MBA students as participants, we investigate how the effect of language sentiment varies with readability and investor sophistication level. We find that language sentiment influences investors’ judgments when readability is low, but not when readability is high. Specifically, when readability is low, disclosures couched in positive language lead to higher earnings judgments for less sophisticated investors, but lower earnings judgments for more sophisticated investors. These findings show that the main effects of readability and language sentiment documented in prior studies have boundary effects, and may reverse when both variables are jointly considered along with investor sophistication. Accepted version 2014-07-24T04:33:36Z 2019-12-06T21:35:44Z 2014-07-24T04:33:36Z 2019-12-06T21:35:44Z 2014 2014 Journal Article Tan, H. T., Wang, E. Y., & Zhou, B. (2014). When the Use of Positive Language Backfires: The Joint Effect of Tone, Readability, and Investor Sophistication on Earnings Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 273-302. 0021-8456 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104586 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20245 10.1111/1475-679X.12039 en Journal of Accounting Research © 2014 University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Journal of Accounting Research, published by University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12039]. 30 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Business::Finance::Investments
spellingShingle DRNTU::Business::Finance::Investments
Tan, Hun-Tong
Ying Wang, Elaine
Zhou, Bo
When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
description Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors’ reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability co-occur in practice, their joint effects remain largely unexplored. In an experiment with MBA students as participants, we investigate how the effect of language sentiment varies with readability and investor sophistication level. We find that language sentiment influences investors’ judgments when readability is low, but not when readability is high. Specifically, when readability is low, disclosures couched in positive language lead to higher earnings judgments for less sophisticated investors, but lower earnings judgments for more sophisticated investors. These findings show that the main effects of readability and language sentiment documented in prior studies have boundary effects, and may reverse when both variables are jointly considered along with investor sophistication.
author2 Nanyang Business School
author_facet Nanyang Business School
Tan, Hun-Tong
Ying Wang, Elaine
Zhou, Bo
format Article
author Tan, Hun-Tong
Ying Wang, Elaine
Zhou, Bo
author_sort Tan, Hun-Tong
title When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
title_short When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
title_full When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
title_fullStr When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
title_full_unstemmed When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
title_sort when the use of positive language backfires : the joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
publishDate 2014
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104586
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20245
_version_ 1770564751980494848