When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments
Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors’ reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability co-occur i...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104586 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20245 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-104586 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1045862023-05-19T06:44:40Z When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments Tan, Hun-Tong Ying Wang, Elaine Zhou, Bo Nanyang Business School DRNTU::Business::Finance::Investments Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors’ reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability co-occur in practice, their joint effects remain largely unexplored. In an experiment with MBA students as participants, we investigate how the effect of language sentiment varies with readability and investor sophistication level. We find that language sentiment influences investors’ judgments when readability is low, but not when readability is high. Specifically, when readability is low, disclosures couched in positive language lead to higher earnings judgments for less sophisticated investors, but lower earnings judgments for more sophisticated investors. These findings show that the main effects of readability and language sentiment documented in prior studies have boundary effects, and may reverse when both variables are jointly considered along with investor sophistication. Accepted version 2014-07-24T04:33:36Z 2019-12-06T21:35:44Z 2014-07-24T04:33:36Z 2019-12-06T21:35:44Z 2014 2014 Journal Article Tan, H. T., Wang, E. Y., & Zhou, B. (2014). When the Use of Positive Language Backfires: The Joint Effect of Tone, Readability, and Investor Sophistication on Earnings Judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(1), 273-302. 0021-8456 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104586 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20245 10.1111/1475-679X.12039 en Journal of Accounting Research © 2014 University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center. This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Journal of Accounting Research, published by University of Chicago on behalf of the Accounting Research Center. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12039]. 30 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
DRNTU::Business::Finance::Investments |
spellingShingle |
DRNTU::Business::Finance::Investments Tan, Hun-Tong Ying Wang, Elaine Zhou, Bo When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
description |
Recent studies document that market participants react positively to the positive language sentiment or tone embedded in financial disclosures, and that investors’ reactions to negative news are more muted with poor disclosure readability. However, while language sentiment and readability co-occur in practice, their joint effects remain largely unexplored. In an experiment with MBA students as participants, we investigate how the effect of language sentiment varies with readability and investor sophistication level. We find that language sentiment influences investors’ judgments when readability is low, but not when readability is high. Specifically, when readability is low, disclosures couched in positive language lead to higher earnings judgments for less sophisticated investors, but lower earnings judgments for more sophisticated investors. These findings show that the main effects of readability and language sentiment documented in prior studies have boundary effects, and may reverse when both variables are jointly considered along with investor sophistication. |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Tan, Hun-Tong Ying Wang, Elaine Zhou, Bo |
format |
Article |
author |
Tan, Hun-Tong Ying Wang, Elaine Zhou, Bo |
author_sort |
Tan, Hun-Tong |
title |
When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
title_short |
When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
title_full |
When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
title_fullStr |
When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
title_full_unstemmed |
When the use of positive language backfires : The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
title_sort |
when the use of positive language backfires : the joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104586 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/20245 |
_version_ |
1770564751980494848 |