Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects

People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rosenthal, Sonny, Detenber, Benjamin H., Rojas, Hernando
Other Authors: Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104705
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25161
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-104705
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1047052020-03-07T12:15:52Z Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects Rosenthal, Sonny Detenber, Benjamin H. Rojas, Hernando Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Communication theories and models People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggest that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas, the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards. Accepted version 2015-03-03T06:41:32Z 2019-12-06T21:37:56Z 2015-03-03T06:41:32Z 2019-12-06T21:37:56Z 2015 2015 Journal Article Rosenthal, S., Detenber, B. H., & Rojas, H. (2015). Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects. Communication research, in press. 0093-6502 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104705 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25161 10.1177/0093650215570657 en Communication research © 2015 The Author(s). This is the author created version of a work that has been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in Communication Research, published by SAGE Publications on behalf of The Authors. It incorporates referee’s comments but changes resulting from the publishing process, such as copyediting, structural formatting, may not be reflected in this document. The published version is available at: [http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093650215570657]. 38 p. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
country Singapore
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Communication theories and models
spellingShingle DRNTU::Social sciences::Communication::Communication theories and models
Rosenthal, Sonny
Detenber, Benjamin H.
Rojas, Hernando
Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
description People generally believe they are less susceptible than others to influences of media, and a growing body of research implicates such biased processing, or third-person perception, in public support for censorship, a type of third-person effect. The current study extends research of the third-person effect by studying two efficacy-related concepts in the context of sexual content in films. Analysis of cross-sectional data from 1,012 Singaporeans suggest that people exhibit self-other asymmetries of efficacy beliefs: They believe others are less capable than they are of self-regulation and that censorship is more effective at restricting others’ access to sexual content in films. Furthermore, the former belief was directly related to the belief that others are more susceptible to negative influence, and thus was indirectly related to support for censorship; whereas, the latter belief was directly related to support for censorship. Results may help distinguish the roles of self-regulation and government censorship as bases of local media standards.
author2 Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
author_facet Wee Kim Wee School of Communication and Information
Rosenthal, Sonny
Detenber, Benjamin H.
Rojas, Hernando
format Article
author Rosenthal, Sonny
Detenber, Benjamin H.
Rojas, Hernando
author_sort Rosenthal, Sonny
title Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_short Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_full Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_fullStr Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
title_sort efficacy beliefs in third-person effects
publishDate 2015
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/104705
http://hdl.handle.net/10220/25161
_version_ 1681046558727995392