Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay
A service provider/retailer offers ancillary service (e.g., shipping by an online retailer) to two types of customers, impatient and patient, who may be heterogeneous both in their delay sensitivities and service valuations. She can use prioritization and/or strategic delay to differentiate them by...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://hdl.handle.net/10356/106422 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/50041 |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Institution: | Nanyang Technological University |
Language: | English |
id |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-106422 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
sg-ntu-dr.10356-1064222023-05-19T06:44:42Z Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay Sainathan, Arvind Nanyang Business School Business::Marketing E-Commerce Free-Shipping A service provider/retailer offers ancillary service (e.g., shipping by an online retailer) to two types of customers, impatient and patient, who may be heterogeneous both in their delay sensitivities and service valuations. She can use prioritization and/or strategic delay to differentiate them by offering two service classes and charging different prices, potentially resulting in a split in which a single customer type selects both the classes. Her objective is to minimize cost while satisfying individual rationality and incentive compatibility conditions. We characterize the optimal solutions under both exogenous and endogenous capacities. We examine the conditions under which the following strategically important features of service delivery are optimal, and relate them to practical scenarios: (i) free service, (ii) single/differentiated service, (iii) split of customers, and (iv) strategic delay. We find that the presence of these features depends on (i) whether the retailer has limited or sufficient capacity and (ii) whether she sells fashion goods or staple products. A typical explanation for offering free service is that it increases demand from customers. We make an operational case for it by showing that even if demand does not change, free service is still optimal under some scenarios. Accepted version 2019-09-30T05:14:18Z 2019-12-06T22:11:21Z 2019-09-30T05:14:18Z 2019-12-06T22:11:21Z 2017 Journal Article Sainathan, A. (2018). Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay. Decision Sciences, 49(4), 690-727. doi:10.1111/deci.12285 0011-7315 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/106422 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/50041 10.1111/deci.12285 en Decision Sciences © 2017 Decision Sciences Institute (Published by Wiley). This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Sainathan, A. (2018). Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay. Decision Sciences, 49(4), 690-727. doi:10.1111/deci.12285, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/deci.12285. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. 41 p. application/pdf |
institution |
Nanyang Technological University |
building |
NTU Library |
continent |
Asia |
country |
Singapore Singapore |
content_provider |
NTU Library |
collection |
DR-NTU |
language |
English |
topic |
Business::Marketing E-Commerce Free-Shipping |
spellingShingle |
Business::Marketing E-Commerce Free-Shipping Sainathan, Arvind Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
description |
A service provider/retailer offers ancillary service (e.g., shipping by an online retailer) to two types of customers, impatient and patient, who may be heterogeneous both in their delay sensitivities and service valuations. She can use prioritization and/or strategic delay to differentiate them by offering two service classes and charging different prices, potentially resulting in a split in which a single customer type selects both the classes. Her objective is to minimize cost while satisfying individual rationality and incentive compatibility conditions. We characterize the optimal solutions under both exogenous and endogenous capacities. We examine the conditions under which the following strategically important features of service delivery are optimal, and relate them to practical scenarios: (i) free service, (ii) single/differentiated service, (iii) split of customers, and (iv) strategic delay. We find that the presence of these features depends on (i) whether the retailer has limited or sufficient capacity and (ii) whether she sells fashion goods or staple products. A typical explanation for offering free service is that it increases demand from customers. We make an operational case for it by showing that even if demand does not change, free service is still optimal under some scenarios. |
author2 |
Nanyang Business School |
author_facet |
Nanyang Business School Sainathan, Arvind |
format |
Article |
author |
Sainathan, Arvind |
author_sort |
Sainathan, Arvind |
title |
Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
title_short |
Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
title_full |
Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
title_fullStr |
Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
title_full_unstemmed |
Customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
title_sort |
customer differentiation with shipping as an ancillary service? free service, prioritization, and strategic delay |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10356/106422 http://hdl.handle.net/10220/50041 |
_version_ |
1770565861093933056 |