Intra-eruption forecasting

Forecasting eruption onsets has received much attention, in both the short and long term. However, an eruption is not easily reduced to an instant in time, and forecasting what happens after eruption onset has received little attention. Any useful definition of an eruption has to allow for activity...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bebbington, Mark S., Jenkins, Susanna F.
Other Authors: Asian School of the Environment
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137220
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Institution: Nanyang Technological University
Language: English
id sg-ntu-dr.10356-137220
record_format dspace
spelling sg-ntu-dr.10356-1372202023-02-28T16:40:48Z Intra-eruption forecasting Bebbington, Mark S. Jenkins, Susanna F. Asian School of the Environment Earth Observatory of Singapore Science::Geology Multi-phase Eruptions Markov Chains Forecasting eruption onsets has received much attention, in both the short and long term. However, an eruption is not easily reduced to an instant in time, and forecasting what happens after eruption onset has received little attention. Any useful definition of an eruption has to allow for activity over scales ranging from days to decades, and can do so only by allowing for multiple eruptive phases. These phases can be defined by having different styles (e.g. effusive and/or explosive) of activity and/or quiescent periods between them. A vital question then presents itself: given what we have seen so far of the eruption, what is likely to happen next? We have recoded a global database of multiple-phase eruptions provided by the Smithsonian Institution’s Global Volcanism Program and the USGS into eight major styles of activity. The resulting database contains c. 700 multi-phase eruptions, with each eruption having up to 50 non-quiescent phases. The resulting record of transitions between states is relatively dense, and a probability tree that models 850 possible phase sequences is infeasible. Thus, we use (semi-)Markov chain models in order to assess the probability of transitioning from one phase of activity to another, as a function of the recent eruption activity. Markov chains describe the path from state to state i.e. from one style of activity to another, under the assumption that only the present state determines the probability of the next state, but the definition of ‘state’ can be extended. The ‘order’ of a Markov chain is the number of previous consecutive phases that are considered to define the current state controlling the next transition, and thus higher order Markov chains can account for a greater degree of memory. A semi-Markov chain is one in which the duration in a given state is not necessarily memoryless. We show how a second-order semi-Markov chain can be used to calculate likelihoods for the next style of activity during an eruption, conditional on the type and elapsed duration of the current phase, and the type and duration of the one preceding it. We find that solely effusive behaviour is unlikely to precede violent explosions, and that Plinian eruptions only become more likely during a sequence once a major eruption occurs. A quantitative method for forecasting intra-eruptive activity supports long-term and short-term decision making. To further refine the model, we discuss possible future developments to differentiate between volcanoes, and to incorporate monitoring data in real time to update forecasts. NRF (Natl Research Foundation, S’pore) MOE (Min. of Education, S’pore) Published version 2020-03-06T09:21:37Z 2020-03-06T09:21:37Z 2019 Journal Article Bebbington, M. S., & Jenkins, S. F. (2019). Intra-eruption forecasting. Bulletin of Volcanology 81(6), 34. doi:10.1007/s00445-019-1294-9 0258-8900 https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137220 10.1007/s00445-019-1294-9 6 81 en Bulletin of Volcanology © 2019 The Author(s). This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. application/pdf
institution Nanyang Technological University
building NTU Library
continent Asia
country Singapore
Singapore
content_provider NTU Library
collection DR-NTU
language English
topic Science::Geology
Multi-phase Eruptions
Markov Chains
spellingShingle Science::Geology
Multi-phase Eruptions
Markov Chains
Bebbington, Mark S.
Jenkins, Susanna F.
Intra-eruption forecasting
description Forecasting eruption onsets has received much attention, in both the short and long term. However, an eruption is not easily reduced to an instant in time, and forecasting what happens after eruption onset has received little attention. Any useful definition of an eruption has to allow for activity over scales ranging from days to decades, and can do so only by allowing for multiple eruptive phases. These phases can be defined by having different styles (e.g. effusive and/or explosive) of activity and/or quiescent periods between them. A vital question then presents itself: given what we have seen so far of the eruption, what is likely to happen next? We have recoded a global database of multiple-phase eruptions provided by the Smithsonian Institution’s Global Volcanism Program and the USGS into eight major styles of activity. The resulting database contains c. 700 multi-phase eruptions, with each eruption having up to 50 non-quiescent phases. The resulting record of transitions between states is relatively dense, and a probability tree that models 850 possible phase sequences is infeasible. Thus, we use (semi-)Markov chain models in order to assess the probability of transitioning from one phase of activity to another, as a function of the recent eruption activity. Markov chains describe the path from state to state i.e. from one style of activity to another, under the assumption that only the present state determines the probability of the next state, but the definition of ‘state’ can be extended. The ‘order’ of a Markov chain is the number of previous consecutive phases that are considered to define the current state controlling the next transition, and thus higher order Markov chains can account for a greater degree of memory. A semi-Markov chain is one in which the duration in a given state is not necessarily memoryless. We show how a second-order semi-Markov chain can be used to calculate likelihoods for the next style of activity during an eruption, conditional on the type and elapsed duration of the current phase, and the type and duration of the one preceding it. We find that solely effusive behaviour is unlikely to precede violent explosions, and that Plinian eruptions only become more likely during a sequence once a major eruption occurs. A quantitative method for forecasting intra-eruptive activity supports long-term and short-term decision making. To further refine the model, we discuss possible future developments to differentiate between volcanoes, and to incorporate monitoring data in real time to update forecasts.
author2 Asian School of the Environment
author_facet Asian School of the Environment
Bebbington, Mark S.
Jenkins, Susanna F.
format Article
author Bebbington, Mark S.
Jenkins, Susanna F.
author_sort Bebbington, Mark S.
title Intra-eruption forecasting
title_short Intra-eruption forecasting
title_full Intra-eruption forecasting
title_fullStr Intra-eruption forecasting
title_full_unstemmed Intra-eruption forecasting
title_sort intra-eruption forecasting
publishDate 2020
url https://hdl.handle.net/10356/137220
_version_ 1759855481097027584